User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Everhardy

Everhardy (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

I’m not sure why you didn’t just block this user outright. A user with “ever hard” in their name who uses Commons to spam dick pics and offer hookups is most assuredly not going to contribute constructively, ever. Dronebogus (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tulegen Dautbayev Portrait.jpg

Hi @Yann

You've just closed the undeletion discussion in the following section, but it's not yet finished as I was going to provide more details supporting the case. Could you please re-open it or let me know how I can re-open it?

thanks Almas Dautbay (talk) 15:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Almas Dautbay: Hi,
There is no way that a 1957 picture from former USSR is in the public domain. In the best case, if it was published at that time, it will be in the public domain in the country of origin in 2028, and in USA in 2053. If it was never published, it will be in the public domain in USA in 2078, as Jim said. Yann (talk) 15:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes,@Yann I'm not challenging that. My hope is to establish the copyright history. After all these discussion here, I'm now trying to contact directly with the descendants of the person depicted in the portrait to get more details. I obtained this photograph from them, and I hope they will be able to provide more details about the history of this specific document photo. I didn’t ask any copyright questions from them earlier, because I was relying on my understanding of the Soviet Law from that time. As I confirmed and quoted above such type of works were not subject to copyright during the Soviet Union time. That’s why I uploaded it almost 3 years ago to Wikimedia without any hesitation or concerns. Now, since we are having this conversation, I will try to reach them and request more details and I will try to return with the details ASAP. Almas Dautbay (talk) 16:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Almas Dautbay: The issue is that the copyright didn't belong to the subject, but to the photographer, unless you could prove that it is a work for hire. Yann (talk) 16:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Thank you for your response. I understand that the copyright would belong to the photographer and not to the subject. I did not suggest otherwise. This is why I am trying to reach the descendants of the person depicted, to see if they know or remember anything about who exactly took the photograph back then. Thank you for your patience and understanding. I hope to get the answer ASAP, hopefully tomorrow. Almas Dautbay (talk) 17:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann I’ve reached the descendants of this person as I planned, and they gave me the contact of one of his daughters, who is still alive (83 years old) - Svetlana Tulegenovna Dautbayeva. Luckily, she is in good health and sound mind, so she was able to remember and provide more details about this photo.
As I initially assumed, the photograph was taken in a regular Soviet photo studio, based on the general practices of the time. However, after speaking to this person, I have learned additional context. It turns out that while the photograph was indeed taken using the equipment of a typical Soviet photo studio, it was actually taken by her. She said that photography was her hobby at the time, and this particular photograph was a memorable event for the family. Her father had just received a rare award - the “Order of Lenin” (attached to his jacket in this portrait), and she wanted to create a new portrait of him as a special memorable gift.
Could you please share the format of explicit permission required from her or the online form that needs to be filled regarding the copyright required to restore this image here? I’ll follow up with the copyright holder accordingly. Almas Dautbay (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Almas Dautbay: Ah great! Please ask her to send a permission via COM:VRT. If she is not able to do it on the Internet, you could also get a paper from her with the same text, which you can then send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This can be done in Russian as well. Yann (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Yann I've requested written permission (in Russian), scanned it and send it to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org <permissions-ru@wikimedia.org> Almas Dautbay (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File : Elrohir et Elladan

Bonjour Yann,

Vous m'avez envoyé un message comme quoi ce fichier devrait être supprimer car c'est la deuxième fois qu'il est téléversé mais l'autre fichier du même nom était une photo de film, donc a été supprimée.

Pourrez vous supprimez la suppression rapide de cette image ?

Merci beaucoup,

Alexandar au Arcos (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital (2024) 01.jpg

Hello Yann, You speedy deleted File:Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital (2024) 01.jpg. Could you tell me the reason? --Gpkp (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gpkp: Hi, It was tagged as advertisement. I undeleted it and created a DR instead. Yann (talk) 18:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, I didnt upload it for any advertising purpose. I keep uploading images of my nearby locality. The image was just a part of it. --Gpkp (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, one more image is: File:R. N. Shetty.jpg.. It wasn't a copyright violation, but an extract of: File:RNS Institute of Technology 73.jpg. Its a picture taken in night of a hording in light. --Gpkp (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gpkp: But this is not free. It is a derivative work. Yann (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, File:RNS Institute of Technology 73.jpg is a F3:'photograph taken in a public place'. Does it require a author-permission? --Gpkp (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gpkp: Yes. For freedom of panorama, it needs to be 1. permanent, 2. not 2D. This is neither. Yann (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to check this?

Category:Jean Rose My French was really not up to figuring this out! I should not have attempted it. Many thanks if you do. Krok6kola (talk) 23:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Message from Franvj

@Hinnk
Erabiltzaile-izena eta pasahitzak editatzeko babesa nahi dut eta bandalismoaren ondoriozko blokeoak kendu nahi ditut posta elektronikotik, momentu honetan gauzak ondo egiten ari naizelako eta denok baitugu barkamenerako eskubidea. Mila esker eta agurrik onena.
Franvj (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Nire erabiltzaile-izena eta pasahitza babestuta egotea gustatuko litzaidake, eduki guztiak atzitu eta editatu ahal izateko eta bandalismoaren ondoriozko blokeoa ken dadila, momentu honetan gauzak ondo egiten ari naizelako eta denek barkamenerako eskubidea dutelako. Eskerrik asko

Franvj (talk) 02:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Alpes et Champsaur

Hello Yann,

Juste un bravo pour tes très jolies photos du Champsaur ! J'apprécie aussi le Valgodemar... Merci pour ces contributions. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 14:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleting my fotos

Hi Yann,

could you please undelete my fotos that where obviously part of different Wikipedia projects and didnt violate any rules?

It didnt work out another way. I would be really thankful. Mitumial (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitumial: You didn't say which picture you want undeleted. I suppose you mean File:IMG Nicolas Lietzau-Schreiber.jpg? Otherwise, undeletion was denied on COM:UDR, so you have to ask there again. Yann (talk) 13:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion request for File:Iqra Hasan.jpg is bound to be approved, it's an open-and-shut case of copyright violation. Could you now ban the user responsible for this (User:Aksphone8182) after the deletion request is approved? C1MM (talk) 15:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello yan! would you be willing to undelete my content? I am the creator for this content and confused about the license at first and tried to change the license via edit tab, turns out it was the one that made this content deleted. Then I tried to upload the same file without realizing that it was actually forbidden.

I then had learned more about license and hereby agree to bestow this content the same license as before as cc by sa 4.0, so can you please undelete this content so it can made available to public again? I already made an undeletion request but It didn't get any response, what do i need to do to get my content back to the web? Errizdwi (talk) 02:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Errizdwi: Where do you want to use your content? Any Wikipedia article? Yann (talk) 08:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yes, I'm planning to use it here https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasi_kotak Errizdwi (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK done. Yann (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help! Errizdwi (talk) 08:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beppe_Grillo_and_Giacinto_Auriti.jpg

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Beppe_Grillo_and_Giacinto_Auriti.jpg--Cats' photos (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PierreRepp-1953.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PierreRepp-1953.png

Hello Yann,

Comme l'a déjà précisé Ruthven dans un cas similaire (voir lien ci-après), le seul motif URAA ne peut pas permettre la suppression car pour le reste, ce fichier est bien PD-France car il a été réalisé et publié au titte d'oeuvre collective par une agence, avant 1954 (j'ai précisé la source en référence, publiée dans un livre). La suppression n'est donc pas possible.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Berger-Gall-Italie-1984.png

Merci de ta compréhension. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 10:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tisourcier: Bonjour, La question de l'URAA est compliquée et controversée. En théorie, l'URAA peut s'appliquer aux oeuvres collectives. Je pense que l'on ne devrait pas en tenir compte pour les documents de plus de 70 ans, mais je suis plutôt en minorité de ce point de vue. Yann (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted these images as copyright violations, but they were released by the creator under CC BY-SA - see their source: https://thecatamites.itch.io/anthology-of-the-killer Eldomtom2 (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I undeleted them, and created regular DRs instead. Yann (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template, which you deleted, has 44 inclusions. Туча (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

Hi Yann. Are you able to oversight something for me at Commons? If so, I'll email you the details. -- Valjean (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valjean: Hi, Yes sure, but it won't be oversighted, just hidden from anyone, except admins. Yann (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That'll work. An email will arrive shortly. -- Valjean (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Valjean: Done. Yann (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Have a great day. -- Valjean (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The representative of the copyright holder, who gave me authority to use the image is off for 4th of July but they will be sending an email when they return. Can we restore the image so when they send an email it will be live again? I had this issue with the other image from yesterday but the copyright holder was able to send an email promptly. Nolansfood (talk) 19:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nolansfood: Hi, The image wil be undeleted when the permission is validated. The author can provided the name of the file in their email. Yann (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joaquim Santos 2024.jpg

You recently speedily deleted the above file. I attempted to leave a note regarding this but unfortunately the link allowing me to contest the speedy deletion didn't work for me so instead I left this note on the file's discussion page. Prior to the speedy deletion the image was used on the Joaquim Santos' Wikidata item but we also wanted to reuse the image as he is an organiser of the Wikidata WikiProject IBC 2024 but also in slides for our Wikidata workshop we are putting on, which we will later upload into WikiCommons. Would it be possible for you to undo the speedy deletion of this file? Thanks for your consideration. Ambrosia10 (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file no deleted, it's blue. メイド理世 (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:À propos de Nice (1930) par Jean Vigo.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIBRASC3

Hello. You recently deleted a file uploaded by the account WIKIBRASC3 ( local | logs | global ). I would like to request that you review their edits here on Commons due to the number of files deleted.

WIKIBRASC3 is about to be banned from creating articles on the Portuguese Wikipedia. However, I have noticed that they have been uploading files here and adding them to articles there, often replacing files uploaded directly to Wikipedia due to license restrictions. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Conde Edmond Dantès: Hi, Please write such requests on COM:ANU. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

Hello, I would like to have your opinion regarding of files such as, among others, this one and whether they're suitable for Commons. Indeed, while the uniform itself (generic colors and design) seems to be OK, however, I can't really say the same thing about the use even if at de minimis scale of logos that otherwise - alone - are mostly forbidden from upload on Commons due to copyright issues. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 21:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Harrisonkrank. Yann (talk) 12:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I recently got a notification from you stating that you will block me if I violate another copyright, I will get blocked. But I dont think that's fair, because after I got notifications of me uploading pictures on wikipedia, I stopped doing it and I only got notified 3 years after I learned my lesson. If I get blocked for something that I didnt do recently, it would not be alright. If that happens, what should I do? Badabingbadaboong (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Badabingbadaboong: You won't be blocked if you don't upload any more copyright violations. Yann (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately pseudo-procedurally closing this immediately after I voted to delete seems like a clear attempt at supervoting. I’m requesting that you revert this extremely bad close. If you don’t I’m going to report an abuse of administrative privilege. Dronebogus (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Chute de la Maison Usher (1928) by Jean Epstein.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]