User talk:Sjoerddebruin

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sjoerddebruin!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Foto Ale S van neutraal foto Niels Westra Tresoar 07-06-2015.jpg

Hallo Sjoerd,

Je tekent bezwaar aan tegen de publicatie van bovenstaande foto in Wikimedia Commons omdat de rechten tot publicatie als open data niet goed zouden zijn afgedekt. Fries historisch en letterkundig centrum 'Tresoar' heeft fotograaf Niels Westra een opdracht verleend om de foto van Ale S. van Zandbergen te maken en daarbij schriftelijk afgesproken dat de foto gepubliceerd kan worden op Wikimedia Commons. Ik heb intussen een mail gestuurd naar permissions-commons@wikimedia.org met behulp van de aangegeven mal. Ik ga ervanuit dat het zo accoord moet zijn.

Met vr gr,

Teake Oppewal Tresoar

Foto's op lijst verwijdering

dag Sjoerd,

Je hebt een aantal afbeeldingen die ik heb geupload op een lijst gezet waarbij de auteursrechten niet bekend zijn. Ze staan op de nominatie verwijderd te worden. Ik heb destijds bij alle afbeeldingen gezet dat de copyright bij mij berust (ik ben schrijver van diverse boeken), of dat ze ouder dan 75 jaar zijn. Ik heb gezet 'eigen werk' bij de afbeeldingen (Source: 'own work'), onder het plaatje. Wat is er mis gegaan? Kortom: alle afbeeldingen die je van mij hebt aangevinkt, mogen dus wel degelijk blijven bestaan op Wikipedia. Er staat dat ik een mail met bewijs moet aanvoeren, maar ik kan onmogelijk voor alle afbeeldingen bewijs aanvoeren; het bestaan van mijn boeken zegt voldoende. Ik heb ze zelf gefotografeerd, of al betaald voor de kopijrechten tijdens het publiceren van mijn boeken. Mijn uitgeverijen en ikzelf nemen uiteraard goede zorg voor copyrights. Ik vond het juist zo leuk de afbeeldingen toe te voegen, omdat het leuke afbeeldingen zijn en de rechten bij mij liggen. Kun je helpen?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Ruben

afzonderlijke paginaas voor een foto-galerie aanmaken.

Hallo Sjoerd,

Ik wil graag voor cde groeiende foto-galeries afzonderlijke paginas aanmaken, maar weet niet hoe dat moet. Kan je me dat uitleggen. Bij Nederlandse Wikimedia zag ik niets staan over uitleg. Bij de engelse kan ik het niet vinden.

Doe ik het goed met het recente plaatsen? Heb je nog suggesties??

het beste,

FotoDutch (talk) 08:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Een afzonderlijke pagina in je gebruikersruimte (je profiel) kun je zo maken:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/FotoDutch/$

Op de plek van de $-teken vul je de naam van de afzonderlijke pagina in. Hierop kun je je fotogalerijen plaatsen. Ik hoop dat je dit dit lukt! En volgens mij gaat het wel goed met de foto's. ;) Ga zo door!

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Te laat :P

Je was net te laat Sjoerd. Een koekje om het goed te maken. Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, lekker! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:JoJo Offerman September 2013.jpg

Eh, [1] is tagged as CC BY-SA 2.0: it IS a free image. I've reverted your speedy deletion tag accordingly. NiciVampireHeart 16:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I think the new photo page of Flickr is very confusing, I only see this. Very weird. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion of signatures

Hi Sjoerd, I hope you don't mind my edits. I just wanted to draw your attention towards Commons:Signatures#Transclusion of templates. If you have questions, please feel invited to ask me. -- Rillke^(q?) 20:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, gonna fix that. Sorry, we do it this way on the Dutch Wikipedia. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I didn't expect you would replace all instances; I am even a bit abashed due to all the work this caused. I just wanted to make you aware of it for the future. Thanks you! -- Rillke^(q?) 23:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1497818 10202748383218893 430695912 o.jpg

Hi you are deleted this file 1497818 10202748383218893 430695912 o.jpg,but this file is a free file (therefore don't viole the violation of copyright) and the author's own work,he has sent the permittion fr@wikimedia.org or permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org you can verify please the other file are also permittion of author and have been sent to fr@wikimedia.org or permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org. sorry for my english. Iffrit51 (talk) 07:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answered by colleague here. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhyesquestworldeditor.png

This picture you marked for deletion is my own work.

You need to proof that with sending a e-mail to the OTRS. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Sjoerddebruin⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centipede Side Art.jpg

File:Centipede Side Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Side Art Applied to the Centipede.jpg

File:New Side Art Applied to the Centipede.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centipede Instruction Sheet.jpg

File:Centipede Instruction Sheet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centipede Cabaret Arcade Game - 5722592218.jpg

File:Centipede Cabaret Arcade Game - 5722592218.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centipede Marquee.jpg

File:Centipede Marquee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Sjoerddebruin,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kenniswaardeketen

Hoi Sjoerd,

Ik zag je opmerkingen op mijn overlegpagina over de kenniswaardeketen. Vreemd. Ik heb contact gehad met dhr. Weggeman over plaatsing. Heb deze mail ook doorgestuurd naar permissions.nl. Heb de mailwisseling zojuist nog een keer doorgestuurd, met het verzoek of iemand mij kan helpen e.e.a. goed in te stellen.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tim Ruijters, Timboliu (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Nanninga foto

Davis, 27 juni 2014

Hallo Sjoerd.

Rob stuurde mij deze foto zelf op 17 mei 2012. Hij schreef me niet wie de auteur van de foto is, maar ik vermoed dat het rond een TV optreden van hem in 1992 is gemaakt. Zoals inmiddels bekend was Rob zeer publiciteitsschuw en foto's van hem zijn schaars. Omdat hij mij deze foto zelf stuurde, met toelichting, vind ik het netjes als deze als hoofdfoto geplaatst wordt, en niet een veel latere, waarvan we niet weten of Rob die oké had gevonden, want hij is inmiddels overleden. Ik zal Jan Willem Nienhuys raadplegen, een goede vriend van hem en mij, die tevens in het bestuur van Skepsis zit.

Met vriendelijke groeten,

Constantia Oomen

Dat maakt het nog niet toegestaan om de foto hier te uploaden. Deze moet aan bepaalde voorwaarden voldoen, die op deze afbeelding duidelijk staan aangegeven. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boos!

Ja, dat ben ik op u. Waarom vraagt u een foto van mij te verwijderen, zonder daarvoor eerst contact met mij te zoeken? Dit vind ik hoogst onfatsoenlijk. Looks like a scan, is u KULargument. Ja duh, in de tijd dat Michel van Oostrum nog bij Emmen voetbalde waren er nog helemaal geen digitale fotocamera's. Dus heb ik inderdaad mijn eigen gemaakte foto van Michel van Oostrum ingescand en geupload. Binnenkort plaats ik hem terug en dan reken ik er op dat u niet zonder geldige reden (en zonder overleg!) MIJN foto's als illegaal bestempeld. Alvast bedankt. 94.213.109.82 13:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Als u ook de rest van het bericht heeft gelezen, zag u dat ik twijfelde of het eigen werk was. Het is dan aan u om te bevestigen dat het eigen werk is, tevens heb ik u gewoon op de hoogte gebracht van de beoordelingsnominatie. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nee, dan is er niets aan de hand! Goed bezig! Eerst nomineren voor verwijdering en dan pas nagaan of dat wel terecht is. Nu moet ik de foto weer opnieuw opzoeken en inscannen, weer bijwerken (want op het origineel sta ik er zelf bij op), weer uploaden en weer terugzetten in het artikel. Al dat werk alleen om dat jij een overijverige moraalridder bent. Mooie flapdrol... 94.213.109.82 06:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Als u zelf op de foto staat, hoe kunt u dan de auteursrechthebbende van de foto zijn? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die heeft hij met de zelfontspanner gemaakt natuurlijk. Trouwens wel kinderachtig om de foto van Pauline van Till te verwijderen. Die vrouw d'r lemma staat ook al op de verwijderlijst op Wikipedia en vele van haar aangemaakte lemma's ook. Er is een verwijderingswoede gaande en wie daaraan meedoet kan beter ver van mij vandaan blijven. - Richardkw (talk) (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tweet

I found it in internet but everybody is tweeting it; I suppose if something is being distributed all over the world through Tweeter, it is public. No? All the best. --E4024 (talk) 10:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean you're the copyright holder of the image. JurgenNL (talk) 11:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I didn't say that anywhere. If I did, it must have been by mistake. --E4024 (talk) 13:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Afbeeldingen boekcovers op lijst te verwijderen afbeeldingen ivm copyright vraag.

Beste Sjoerd,

tot mijn verbazing heb je een drietal afbeeldingen van boekcovers van mijn eigen boeken (!) op de te verwijderen lijst geplaatst. Alle drie de boekomslagen betreffen werk van de auteur Anna A Ros (pseudoniem van Alice (Anna) Verheij) uit de periode dat ik nog onder eigen naam publiceerde en niet onder pseudoniem. De boeken zijn uitgeven bij WoordenStorm (www.woordenstorm.nl) in eigen beheer en inmiddels op één na niet meer beschikbaar in papieren vorm. De copyrights van de werken berusten uiteraard bij WoordenStorm / Alice (Anna) Verheij. Of is het zo dat er helemaal geen boekomslagen mogen worden opgenomen in Wikipedia (Ik zie er overigens vele)? Wat voor bewijs heb je nodig dat dat zo is in dit geval? Als je een verklaring van de uitgever wilt hebben dan bij deze:

WoordenStorm Uitgeverij verklaard dat alle werken van Alice (Anna) Verheij incl. de onder haar pseudoniem Anna A. Ros verschenen en nog te verschijnen werk onder het reguliere auteursrecht vallen. Dat geldt ook voor boekomslagen, grafisch werk, fotografie en video die onder haar naam is of wordt uitgebracht. Boekomslagen die geplaatst zijn op Wikipedia zijn vrij beschikbaar onder de voor Wikipedia van toepassing zijnde licentievorm. WoordenStorm is ingeschreven bij de KvK onder nummer 57884544 en gevestigd te Middelburg A. Verheij WoordenStorm tekst - boeken - beeld - websites - events Dam 63d 4331GH Middelburg

Ik hoor graag van je hoe e.e.a. zit want ik ben nogal nieuw hier en vind het ontzettend ingewikkeld en ontoegankelijk. Mvg, Alice Anna Verheij

We moeten op dit project zeker weten dat we te maken hebben met Alice Anna Verheij. Daarom is het handig dat u de instructies op uw overlegpagina opvolgt. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

nog een foto op de verwijderlijst

Beste Sjoerd, Ik kreeg bericht dat je voorstelt om de afbeelding Sint-Joep05.jpg te verwijderen. Reden: geportretteerde zou onmogelijk de maker kunnen zijn, dus 'own work' zou niet van toepassing zijn. Twee vragen daarom: 1. hoe weet jij dat geportretteerde Sint-Joep zelf is? Je neemt het aan (neem ik aan)? Goed aangenomen, daar niet van. 2. Gaat het niet wat ver om vader of moeder van geportretteerde te moeten benaderen om toestemming te geven om een in het familie-album geplakte foto te publiceren?

Puur juridisch is er geen speld tussen te krijgen en kun je je gang gaan. Ik zal mij niet verzetten. Maar de wereld wordt niet mooier door letterknechterij.

Groet, Sint-Joep (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Het zijn de regels hier, daar kan ik niets aan veranderen. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spoorjan

Subject is also the uploader and author of the picture, permission of the photographer will be needed. Deze foto is geen deel van de ecyclopedie maar onderdeel van mijn persoonlijk voordracht als deelnemer op Wikipedia. De foto past in dit geheel. U zelf bent geen echte groninger. Spoorjan (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daar gelden dezelfde regels voor. Waar dat laatste op slaat zou ik niet weten. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Het slaat op een domme persoon.

File:Ton Baas.jpg

File:Ton Baas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.87.102.156 06:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Skinny Molly

i contacted the owner of the picture, and he didn't have any problems with the usage on Wikipedia. what do i need to do now? Wiki Elvis (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OTRS for that. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`.

Hi Sjoerddebruin, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! 1989 02:16, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Broodje

Dag, Sjoerd. Dit moeten we niet willen. Zie ook hier op nlwiki. Vriendelijke groet, ErikvanB (talk) 21:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ik vind het een slechte vorm van een gesproken artikel. Ik zou zeggen nomineren voor verwijdering, maar of dat succesvol gaat worden geen idee. Mbch331 (talk) 09:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ik zou zeggen: overleg eerst met naar of hem voor je het "hogerop" gaat zoeken. Ik vind rode collegae altijd een beetje verdacht. Verder eens met Mbch, maar pas daarna als overleg niks oplevert. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 10:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overleg? Had je het helemaal beluisterd? Bewust een gek stemmetje opzetten, durf ik te stellen, een rare opmerking tussendoor, gegiechel... Maar ik zie het al, hij heeft op 26 juli een nieuwe en kortere versie geüpload. Het bestand Broodje.ogg dat ik beluisterd had, was toegevoegd op 25 juli en is inmiddels verdwenen. Dat is ook de versie die RJB beluisterd had. Is de oude versie door hemzelf overschreven of heeft een mod die verwijderd? Groet, ErikvanB (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

En dit, Klaas? Is dit geen vandalisme? ErikvanB (talk) 16:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gebruiker geblokkeerd, bestanden verwijderd. ErikvanB (talk) 17:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hoe vandalistisch en/of illegaal een bijdrage ook is de overtre(e)d(st)er dient altijd verwittigd te worden van haar/zijn (wan)daden en een reden voor modacties anders leren ze het nooit af en denken dat vrije bewerkbaarheid ook geknoei toelaat. Collega Natuur12 heeft deze taak inmiddels op zich genomen. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 06:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barthold Arnold baron van Verschuer.jpg

File:Barthold Arnold baron van Verschuer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

INeverCry 20:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foto benoeming ambassadeur

Mbt tot die foto; ik heb geen intentie om het op een publieke wikipedia-pagina te zetten, het was louter ter illustratie bij een snelle vraag aan iemand om een verouderd stukje te wijzigen..

Ja, dat snap ik. Maar daarna moet hij wel hier vandaan, want op Commons staan alleen vrije afbeeldingen. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Straten in Stad

Moi Sjoerd, ik zag nu pas dat je - een tijd geleden al - de Streets in Groningen (city) had verhuisd uit de hoofdcategorie naar Transport in Groningen (city). Dat heb ik vandaag ongedaan gemaakt. Straten dienen immers niet enkel voor vervoer, maar vooral ook om locaties aan te geven. De stratencat is daarmee een belangrijk navigatiemiddel binnen de hoofdcat, ook bij het uploaden van foto's trouwens. Als die cat alleen in de transportcategorie staat, is ze bijna onzichtbaar, terwijl het juist met afstand de best uitgebouwde cat van Stad is. Hopende op je begrip, en groet, Wutsje 12:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, ik weet niet meer mijn redenatie destijds maar snap je argumentatie. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Het verbaasde me ook al dat je de Squares dan weer niet had meeverhuisd. Overigens ben ik er wel voor om een en ander bij Stad net zo in te richten als bij Utrecht is gedaan, dus de streets and squares bij elkaar nemen. Het onderscheid is vaak toch al arbitrair (denk aan het A-Kerkhof of de Rademarkt) en het maakt het navigeren veel eenvoudiger. Verder had ik vanmiddag de hoofdcat wat willen opruimen, maar dat wordt nu niets, om de een of andere reden is Commons de afgelopen uren ergerniswekkend traag. Wutsje 12:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toestemming voor drie afbeeldingen

Hallo Sjoerd, je hebt op mijn overlegpagina aangegeven dat voor drie afbeeldingen de toestemming ontbreekt. Guusje Kaayk heeft op 19 april de toestemming voor de afbeeldingen van haar twee werken (File:Guusje Kaayk Tekeningen voor Zinder Tiel.jpg en File:Guusje Kaayk Somos.jpg) naar Permissions gestuurd. De concept-toestemmingsverklaring voor de foto van haar vader Lou Smeets (File:Lou Smeets.jpg) heb ik vanmiddag aan haar geë-maild en ik verwacht dat zij hem morgen naar Permissions zal sturen. Groet, Kattiel (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gebruik volgende keer {{OTRS pending}} voor dit soort gevallen, dat geeft mij als toevallige voorbijganger meer duidelijkheid. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zet ik dat dan bij de omschrijving? Kattiel (talk) 19:25, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zolang het maar ergens staat moet het goedkomen dacht ik. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, dank voor de tip. Kattiel (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ben Woldring.png

File:Ben Woldring.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ben Woldring (cropped).png

File:Ben Woldring (cropped).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rubins J. Spaans.jpg

File:Rubins J. Spaans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chunlei Guo.jpg

File:Chunlei Guo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 02:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wb21b.jpg

Sjoerd, Dit is een cover van een nota voor de tweede kamer, en als zodanig rechtenvrij. Hoe moet ik dat bij opladen aangeven? {{CC0}} is dus blijkbaar niet goed. HJVerhagen (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Een link waar dat staat aangegeven zou genoeg moeten zijn. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muse-money.jpeg

File:Muse-money.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missing permission Unagize.png

Hey ik zag, dat je unagize.png hebt getagd omdat het een 'permission' mist. De afbeelding kwam van een momentopname van een video van Unagize "24 uur minecraft in stilte spelen" van 11-08-2019. De video is door omstandigheden offline gehaald, maar destijds werd het gepubliceerd onder een CC-license. Ik heb een link naar een archiveerde versie van de video onder de beschrijving geplaatst, waarop de CC-licentie wordt getoond. Tomaatje12 (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dat was nu wat moeilijker te zien inderdaad. Voor de toekomst is {{LicenseReview}} interessant. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kunnen we zeggen dat de zaak opgelost is? Tomaatje12 (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ja! Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honiara Airport departures.jpg

File:Honiara Airport departures.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2600:100C:A115:208A:9403:985E:95AD:FA24 18:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:VodafoneZiggo logo.webp

File:VodafoneZiggo logo.webp is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G4 (recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vodafone 2017.svg

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

0x0a (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Sjoerddebruin

Foto Ale S van neutraal foto Niels Westra Tresoar 07-06-2015.jpg

Foto's op lijst verwijdering

afzonderlijke paginaas voor een foto-galerie aanmaken.

Te laat :P

Autopatrol given

Re: File:JoJo Offerman September 2013.jpg

Transclusion of signatures

File:1497818 10202748383218893 430695912 o.jpg

File:Rhyesquestworldeditor.png

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

Kenniswaardeketen

Rob Nanninga foto

Boos!

File:Tweet

Afbeeldingen boekcovers op lijst te verwijderen afbeeldingen ivm copyright vraag.

nog een foto op de verwijderlijst

Picture Skinny Molly

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

Broodje

Foto benoeming ambassadeur

Straten in Stad

Toestemming voor drie afbeeldingen

Wb21b.jpg

Important message for file movers

Missing permission Unagize.png

Navigation menu

Search