User talk:Mhhossein

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mhhossein!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fatimah Calligraphy.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mhhossein. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vector Ghadir

[edit]

I've uploaded a vectorized version of the Ghadir logo. Hope you like it.

As I've said, I'm new here and you should know it wasn't intentional. The wording is rather confusing : This site requires you to provide copyright information for this work, to make sure everyone can legally reuse it. This file is my own work. This file is not my own work.

Since I made the .svg file, would that be considered my work or yours?

Since I can't delete the file and start over, I'm trying to figure out how to edit the information. GDJ2015 (talk) 03:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GDJ2015: Thanks for signing your post. As it is shown here, I am the copy right holder of the logo and have released the work under CC license, i.e., I have premised others to use it or modify it provided that they attribute the work to me and credit me. Even, in the cases the file is modified, as what you did with the logo, the copy right is mine and you have to refer to me. Check how I'll fix the problem and get familiar with it for your further works. Mhhossein (talk) 05:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Voice of America

[edit]

Hi, Mhhossein. Per User talk:Krassotkin/Archive/2016 Voice of America materials of Voice of America are now allowed into Commons. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This meant to be mine

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein,

I trust you're fine. While others may not consider this edit constructive, I want to thank you for helping the new editor. You deserve more than a barnstar. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 13:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicology: It's a good feeling to see others trust you. Thanks for being patient with my bold edit on your talk page. --Mhhossein talk 16:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is an abusive DR. This is a 19th century ordinary building, so there is absolutely no reason to create a DR here. It would be much better for you to create DRs only when you know the subject. Here you don't know the French law about architecture, and the history of this building. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is also the case for DRs of old Italian buildings you created. These buildings are 2,000 years old, in case you didn't know. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yann: Thanks for the point, however We work based on COM:PRP and the uploader or anyone who wants to keep the file has to show that the subject is in PD by now. Regarding Italian buildings, did you know that per Italy FOP law "photos of any cultural heritage asset are subject to pre-emptive authorisation, a fee and other restriction due to the cultural heritage and landscape law?" --Mhhossein talk 18:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but your understanding of COM:PRP is wrong. It means if there is a doubt, delete, but here there is no doubt whatsoever. AFAIK, we keep Italian pictures if the building is old, regardless of your quote. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yann: Contrary to you, I'm speaking based on a documented copy right law which raises enough doubt for starting a DR! Apparently you are unaware of it. But I had mentioned it in my nomination, I wonder how you could ignore it! Mhhossein talk 05:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am very aware, but, I repeat, your understanding of this is wrong. You need a significant doubt to start a DR. Please correct this, you are just creating useless work for already overbooked admins. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yann:Actually, you did ignore it in practice, even if you were aware of it. If you knew it, I mean if you were aware that "photos of any cultural heritage asset [in Italy] are subject to pre-emptive authorisation, a fee and other restriction due to the cultural heritage and landscape law," you would verify that the mentioned law makes enough doubt for raising a DR. Your comments are not fair at all. --Mhhossein talk 13:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yann:Don't forget that you're a volunteer like dozens of others. So, thanks to your efforts, you are not forced to be one of those "already overbooked admins." --Mhhossein talk 13:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see Commons:Non-copyright restrictions where it says "Commons considers non-copyright restrictions to be matters for photographers/uploaders or reusers and are not grounds for deletion of works from Commons". --Sporti (talk) 06:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sporti: But we're exactly talking about a copyright restriction! --Mhhossein talk 06:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure we are not: "Non-copyright restrictions are restrictions on the use of material which are distinct from copyright; such restrictions may apply to works in the public domain (e.g. works no longer subject to copyright) or be additional restrictions on the use of copyrighted works". It is even called cultural heritage and landscape law (not copyright). --Sporti (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FOP have been used as a ground for DRs on several occasions. --Mhhossein talk 10:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even your DR about Iranian items is not OK: the DR is fine for the recent building, but not for trains and escalators. So once more, do not create DRs until you get a clear understanding of copyright, which do not have presently. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Don't make such unfair and non-constructive comments, please. You're speaking as if you'd never made a mistake. However, I assume your good faith. Note that I have made several successful nominations. --Mhhossein talk 13:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Attention please

[edit]

Well, what you just called " useless work for already overbooked admins" now appears to be a legal act the project really needed. I think, you were hasty enough to close those discussions (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rome (14485102670).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rome (14468593049).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arco di Costantino Roma (14660480248).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rome (14824128856).jpg) as 'keep'. I would not bite other users, as you just did. Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 12:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can see how this was deleted. --Mhhossein talk 12:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source?

[edit]

Yes, it's on a publicly accessible Google Drive shared folder. --Filip (§) 22:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Filip: I could not open the link as I may have gone the wrong way. Could you please provide me with the correct link? --Mhhossein talk 03:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8UTKzll2fWpUGF3dUdqVmJyRms --Filip (§) 06:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Mhhossein, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Do not revert me. I closed the DR after reading the discussion, and it was open for more than a week. I don't think you should reopen it yourself. I don't mind if someone else think there is a reason to reopen it. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yann: OK. Just tell me why you think the file should be kept? Btw, I'm well aware of your background. --Mhhossein talk 12:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Daphne Lantier: As an uninvolved admin, would you mind seeing if Yann's actions was right? I believe that he ignored our ongoing discussion where we were discussing that the Angola's FOP law has a major "if" ignoring which can lead into copyright violation. As you see, no valid answer is given to my concern (also the other user was waiting for an email from Angloa's embassy.) --Mhhossein talk 14:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be a better idea to post either at COM:VP/C or COM:UDEL. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Daphne Lantier: Thanks for the suggestions. But shouldn't the closing admin be answering about his action? I think his closure was weird and needs to be investigated by other admins. --Mhhossein talk 05:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you can post at COM:AN/U, but that's usually reserved for serious problems. COM:VP/C would probably be the best idea if the file has been kept, and you dispute that result. Daphne Lantier 06:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again. This user had been previously taken to COM:AN/U for similar reasons. --Mhhossein talk 13:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noor vs Nasr-1 missile

[edit]

I saw you declined this file move, but the source page appeared to describe it as a Nasr-1, but now I see the source page identifies both Nasr-1 and Noor missiles. The file mover put a long description in Chinese about how it's obviously not a Noor (translation: "The figure is not Noor missiles, no inlet and other obvious external features, no rocket booster, rocket engine ignition, in line with Nasr-1 missile features"). It is used on the Farsi page about Noor missiles but they copied the entire thing from the English Wikipedia page. I'm happy to move it back if you're sure it's not a Nasr-1. 18:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

ِDear User:Wikimandia, at first I was upset by the revert, then I searched more and now think that the removing was right. Thank you for that. --Mhhossein talk 18:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response. I also noticed that the Iranian missiles are copies of the Chinese missiles, so it made sense that this user might have some expertise. Take care! Wikimandia (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

niki Karimi

[edit]

hello i'm sure that file was my own work. Picture taken in Festival International des Cinémas d'Asie in Vesoul. Please Not to delele thanks Jeffdelonge (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jeffdelonge, the file is removed because it was apparently infringing copyright. Older versions were found elsewhere on the net. --Mhhossein talk 12:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patroller

[edit]

Hi, I marked your account as a patroller instead of just autopatrolled. If you're doing license reviews or otherwise looking at an image, you can click "Mark this file version as patrolled" to certify that it seems fine, or you're tagging it appropriately to deal with any problems. Guanaco (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Guanaco: Thank you for granting the new right. I'll use it to reduce the backlog. --Mhhossein talk 13:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein, I would like to ask you to Review the pictures in this category. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I've already passed one of them and will review the rest. --Mhhossein talk 19:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I also changed the licensing terms as I really doubt if those files were in PD-Iran. --Mhhossein talk 20:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tasnim Photos

[edit]

Hi! Please read the {{Tasnim}} description. Do not mark the Tasnim photos without the photographer name and Tasnim watermark as reviewed. (few examples: [1] [2] [3]) -- Meisam (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meisam! Thanks for reminding. I was not aware that the authors were not credited and I had to pay attention. However, as I explained here, the photos don't seem to be copyvios, hence I turned the copyvios into DR so that we can discuss them deeper. --Mhhossein talk 05:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I also added my comments. -- Meisam (talk) 11:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In reviewing this image you forgot to remove the Tasnimnews review needed category at the bottom of the page. I must admit is is easy to forget, so please be careful in future when reviewing Tasnim images. I've removed it for you. Ww2censor (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ww2censor: Thanks for reminding. I have opened a topic here in this regard. Thank you again for telling me this. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 18:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:The exploded office.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MasoodHA (talk) 15:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pakpour-2017 Tehran attacks.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Per the discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

MasoodHA (talk) 07:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nakhl Gardani Taft town, Iran.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nakhl Gardani Taft town, Iran.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MasoodHA (talk) 07:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

عکسهایی در صفحه خلیل نظری که حذف گردیده اند.

[edit]

سلام و درود دوست گرامی از اینکه فارسی مینویسم عذرخواهی مرا پذیرا باشید زیرا متاسفانه دسترسی به کیبورد انگلیسی ندارم، خواستم بپرسم عکسهایی از مدارک و جوایز و لوح تقدیر هایی را در ویکی انبار آپلود کنم اگر امکانش هست راهنمایی کنید،زیرا قبلا اینکار را کرده ام و دوستان بدلیل کپی رایت حذف کردندولی اگر صاحب اثر خودشان این عکسهارا نشر نداده بودند که الان در فضای مجازی پر نبود پس اجازه نشر را داده اند. همچنین خواستیم که عکسی که شخصا گرفته ایم را بارگزاری کنیم باید چ ویژگی هایی را دارا باشد؟ بازهم قبلا از پاسخگویی سپاسگزارم Sajadbvb (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

سلام بر شما، خواهش میکنم. فارسی نوشتن هیچ مشکلی ندارد. این که یک عکس در فضای مجازی پر است، به هیچ وجه مجوز نمیشود شما آن را در اینجا بارگزاری کنید. اگر تصاویر به این دلیل حذف شده است، کاملا صحیح بوده است. برای جلوگیری از حذف، چنانچه به صاحب اثر دسترسی دارید مطالب موجود در این صفحه را مطالعه کنید و براساس آن عمل کنید. اگر عکسی را که شخصا گرفته اید که مشکلی وجود ندارد و میتوانید بارگزاری کنید. --Mhhossein talk 15:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

درود بر شما، منظورمان این است که ما به شخصه عکس از مدارک گرفتیم ولی چون عکس شبیه دیگر مدارک موجود در نت شده قبول نمیکند، مدارک رو نمیشه جور دیگر آپلود کرد؟ Sajadbvb (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajadbvb: سلام و درود، به تفکیک پذیری (رزولوشن) هم اهمیت داده میشود. اگر تصویر شما بالاترین کیفیت موجود را داشته باشد یعنی مربوط به شماست. --Mhhossein talk 17:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: درود مجدد، الان ما یک عکس با رزولوشن پایین آپلود کردیم ، اگرهمان عکس را با رزولوشن بالا آپلود کنیم اشکال اینکه قبل آپلود شده در ویکی پیش نمیاد؟Sajadbvb (talk) 09:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Sajadbvb: همانطور که عرض کردم، اگر تصویر شما دارای بالاترین رزولوشن باشد به طوری که قبلا جای دیگری بارگزاری نشده باشد، این موضوع به میزان زیاد تایید میکند که شما خودتان به تصویر اصلی دسترسی دارید. --Mhhossein talk 16:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: درود فراوان، عکس را خودمان گرفته ایم ولی قبلا با رزولوشن پایین آپلود کردیم حال رزولوشن بالای آنرا میخواهیم آپلود کنیم اشکالی که ندارد؟ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajadbvb (talk • contribs) 19:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
سلام. رزولوشن طوری باشد که قبلا مشابه آن دیده نشده باشد. --Mhhossein talk 12:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

رفع مشکل حذف تصاویر

[edit]

سلام بر شما
وقت بخیر
چند تصویر بارگذاری شده که JuTa اقدام به حذف آنها کرده. به این دلیل که قادر به خواندن مجوز نیست (چون وبسایت فارسی است)! دوستان گفتند این مشکل را شما میتوانید حل کنید. برای همین مزاحم شما شدم. آخر این صفحه درموردش بحث شده. متشکرم.

@Sesatamo: سلام وقت شما هم بخیر، در همان صفه بحث خودتان پاسخ خواهم داد. --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein: تشکر بسیار. اما گویا شما فقط مجوز یکی از تصاویر را تایید کردید. این مشکل برای همه این تصاویر ایجاد شده که همۀ تصاویر هم از یک وب‌گاه و با همان مجوز هستند، و اخطار حذفشان در همان صفحه بحث موجود است. ممنونم--Sesatamo (talk) 12:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sesatamo: این تصاویر را خود سایت ایشان تهیه و منتشر نموده است؟ --Mhhossein talk 13:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: بله کاملا.--Sesatamo (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Sesatamo: مثلا این منبع رو ببینید. اینها هم مدعی هستند تصاویر مال اونهاست. این را چه میگویید؟ --Mhhossein talk 19:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein: در مورد این عکس مشکلی نیست. این عکس را به خاطر زاویه و کیفیت مناسب انتخاب کرده بودم. با این حال در این مورد اصراری نیست. میتوان عکس مورد اشاره را حذف کرد و دوتا از تصاویر این دیدار که بدون آرم اختصاصی وب‌گاه رسمی ایشان جای دیگری بازنشر نشده‌اند را جایگزین کرد تا چنین شبهه‌ای هم نباشد: (این عکس و این عکس). سایر عکسهای بارگذاری شده نیز تماما توسط وب‌گاه رسمی ایشان تهیه و منتشر شده‌اند. متشکر از بررسی و عنایت شما--Sesatamo (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

سلام، شما لازم نیست مرا پینگ کنید. خب، شما بفرمایید چطور میشود قبول کرد مثلا این عکس یا عکسهای قدیمی را باز هم همین سایت تهیه کرده باشد؟ --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. اینطور میشود قبول کرد که «فقط یا اولین‌بار» توسط این وبسایت رسمی منتشر شده‌اند. (البته بعدا به عنوان عکسی از یک منبع معتبر، مورد استفادۀ وبسایتهای خبری نیز قرار گرفته‌اند.) این موضوع مخصوصا در مورد تصاویر به راحتی قابل جستجوست.--Sesatamo (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sesatamo: در مورد تصاویر جدید بهتر است از عکاس بخواهید از طریق OTRS اعلام رضایت کند. در مورد تصاویر قدیمی هم از بقیه کاربران میپرسم. --Mhhossein talk 19:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein: سلام دوست عزیز. به نظر میرسید تصاویر منتشر شده با مجوز CC BY-SA 3.0 از یک وبسایت رسمی معتبر، مانعی برای بازنشر در ویکی پدیا ندارد. اینطور نیست؟--Sesatamo (talk) 20:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein: سلام بر شما دوست عزیز. گویا این موضوع به دست فراموشی سپرده شد!؟--Sesatamo (talk) 11:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sesatamo: سلام برخی از تصاویر توسط من و برخی دیگر توسط دیگر کاربران تایید شده اند. --Mhhossein talk 19:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture in Iran

[edit]

Hi, There are still 2 requests pending on COM:UDR for more than a month. Could you have a look please? See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Architecture in Iran. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann: Sorry for the delay. I already made my comment. I can keep on, if there are more things to say. --Mhhossein talk 19:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment. Yes, we need more information about architecture and copyright law in Iran. Jim argues that architects can't do work for hire, while others argue for the opposite. What's your opinion? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yann: I modified a mistake and made another comment. --Mhhossein talk 13:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tasnim reviews

[edit]

Just a heads up. When you are reviewing Tasnim images that have had the proper substituted template applied {{subst:Tasnim/subst}} it will have included the category Category:Tasnimnews review needed. After you give it a good review you must remember to manually remove the category, otherwise it still sits there for review. I just fixed File:Funeral of Levon Haftvan 02.jpg for you. If you find Tasnim images that have just got a plain {{Tasmin}} template it is best to replace it with the substituting template. If you don't know about this page, Commons:Where is the license on various sites? you may find it useful. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ww2censor: Thanks so much.--Mhhossein talk 17:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing

[edit]

Hey Mohammad Hossein, can you do reviewing of my uploads replace of Leoboudv according to this discusion.--Rafic.Mufid (talk) 11:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rafic.Mufid: I noticed Leoboudv's pings but also noticed that you were unwilling to have my intervention. That's why I did not respond there. Which files do you mean? --Mhhossein talk 05:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the files i upload in these days from Fars source. It's not " intervention", we both are users but you can do review. --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Leoboudv: Hi, Sorry for the delay. I'll see what I can do, though that will be not easy. --Mhhossein talk 17:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Nowruz

[edit]
Nowruz
Happy Nowruz Mohammad Hossein! Rafic.Mufid (talk) 08:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Rafic.Mufid: Thank you very much. --Mhhossein talk 09:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

[edit]

Hi. You've got mail.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:33, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeff. See my reply, please. --Mhhossein talk 11:59, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein. Would you please Review the images in this category I have uploaded them for a week, but the license review has not been checked yet. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 09:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mbazri: ✓ Done - Although I don't mind if you ask me for review, note that the files will be reviewed by one our reviewers or admins, soon or late. --Mhhossein talk 11:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you anyway.--Mbazri (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sockelflak - German AA cannon.jpg

[edit]

So changing the brightness and contrast of an existing photo is copyright infringement? Brilliant! Snowdawg (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snowdawg: Oh, thanks for letting me know. I'll withdraw. --Mhhossein talk 18:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that I have reverted to the first version as per Commons:Overwriting existing files. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Mujahedin photo

[edit]

Hello - We have taken the photo ourselves. Maybe other blogs have copied that from Wiki commons. Please return to photo to Wiki Commons.https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PersianDutchNetwork#File:Mujahedin_Khalq_Gathering_in_Paris_June_2018.jpg

Thanks --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The picture need to be released under a free license by the author and/or copyright holder (who is the author himself at most of the times). Moreover, unfortunately I don't have the right to do the undeletion and the admin won't restore it unless it's proven the work is free. See Commons:Licensing for more details. --Mhhossein talk 15:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We have taken the photo ourselves in Paris. How should we prove that? --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the author needs to release the photo under a license compatible with Commons:Licensing. --Mhhossein talk 04:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are you the author? --Mhhossein talk 05:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we are the author and we already released the rights. Similar to other photos we have taken and uploaded to Wiki commons. --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "we are the author"? Who took the photo? By the way, I'm seeing enough instructive comments on your talk page on how to prove authorship by OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 05:18, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have taken the photo myself. Someone else has copied that from Wiki Commons and because of that you have deleted the photo without consultation! So strange and disappointing.--PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If it's done by you, then you can prove it via OTRS. I think you're familiar with the process (Revision #210978534). --Mhhossein talk 19:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No I am not familiar with the process. Please explain. Thanks.--PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 04:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see your talk page once again, you're apparently advised by other editors regarding OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 12:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maserati Tipo 60

[edit]

Regarding "Maserati Tipo 61 fr.jpg‎", you denied the renaming request. Could you please offer more details on how maserati.com does not show such error (at least provide a URL or similar reference for readers like me). I have no doubt this is a Tipo 60 (ref. http://www.barchetta.cc/english/all.maserati/Detail/2460.Tipo.60.htm]) ... Ketil3 (talk) 08:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ketil3...Sorry for the decline. But that was because of this url. As you see, there's apparently no significant difference in the two models appearance. Moreover, you can see File:Maserati Tipo 61 Birdcage 2459.gif. Do you still think it's certainly Tipo 60? --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is the engine difference, here's another calling it Tipo 60: [4]. But, OK ... just keep the name. It is not so important.Ketil3 (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ketil3. I'm not insisting on the current name. You can make another rename request, so that other file movers address your request. --Mhhossein talk 15:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change Name

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein. I'd like to ask you to change the name of this file to Mohammad Pakpour in 2018 Chabahar suicide bombing. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mbazri, can you try {{Rename}} instead? That would be a good practice for you. It's easy, but don't hesitate to ask me for help, if you had issues with using the template. --Mhhossein talk 05:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Thank you for your helpful guidance. But tell me please, how will it be changed? Will an administrator do it?--Mbazri (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, admins or file movers will do the rest. --Mhhossein talk 16:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's moved by an admin. --Mhhossein talk 12:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Mhhossein, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 13:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd and 4nn1l2: Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 11:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Query

[edit]

Hi, could you clarify for me why the image does not qualify for speedy deletion, as you noted here: [5]? --K.e.coffman (talk) 07:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi K.e.coffman, sure! PD issues are usually better to be discussed by other users given the complexity of the regulations we've got regarding them. I suggest you to explain at the DR why you think the works are not in PD and they will be deleted with 7 days (some times more), if the given rationale applies. --Mhhossein talk 08:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the response. The commons deletion process can be unpredictable; see for example this deletion request from October that is still to be actioned:
Here's a deletion request that I started, also from October:
Do you have insight why these two are still to be closed? --K.e.coffman (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay, yes that can happen sometimes. You can ask for closure at the administrators noticeboard. --Mhhossein talk 03:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

علت حذف عکس شهره قمر

[edit]

درود. علت حذف فایل شهره قمر چی بود که حذفش کردین؟ Nimaganji62 (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

منبعی که برای تصویر ارایه شده بود استفاده رایگان را مجاز ندانسته بود. --Mhhossein talk 07:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file was uploaded by Nate N8bit Herrara, which is apparently the creative lead of PUBG, as shown in the LinkedIn profile.. Their username corresponds to that user. In addition, I have a reddit exchange where I asked them to upload said photo (the same account also uploaded the initial appearance of the gallery on the web, on Imgur, so I'm sure it is indeed n8bit's reddit account) . How should I continue? Should I upload screenshots of that reddit PM exchange to OTRS, or what? Tutelary (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am mistaken. Carry on. Tutelary (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein,

An image that you recently deleted has been referenced in an OTRS ticket to allow it to stay. -- 1989 (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm dealing with the ticket. --Mhhossein talk 17:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Mhhossein talk 17:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you deleted this photo. It appears on https://davids.house.gov/about which has the copyright statement "Except as otherwise noted in this website, all of the content of the website constitutes a work of the Federal government under sections 105 and 403 of title 17 of the U.S. Code." --GRuban (talk) 14:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, GRuban. I've restored it for now. Can you provide the link to the source? --Mhhossein talk 18:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This photo has been on shariceforcongress.com since at least October 5, 2018... a month before she was elected, three months before she sworn-in as a US Representative. This is not a US Government issued photo. Corky 18:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the insight. --Mhhossein talk 02:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein, this image escaped my notice (because it's under a new name) - I was wondering if this too could be deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stan old,
I can't say for definite but I'm 90% convinced that image was uploaded previously here,
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Davey. The file was uploaded just one time and apparently had never been DRed. Do the job and ping me, please. --Mhhossein talk 03:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Image is now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Breasts size 85C descr.jpg, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 23:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do the job if there was no objection after 7 days. --Mhhossein talk 07:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: ✓ Done. --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pallavi Purohit

[edit]

Hi, How are you saying that the pictures I have uploaded are copyright violations?! Just because those pictures are existing on the internet before?! They too have been uploaded by me only! All the pictures I have uploaded have been removed citing copyright violations! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous.celeb (talk • contribs) 19:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to prove that you're the author/copyright holder. See COM:licensing. --Mhhossein talk 06:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File that you deleted!

[edit]

Hello Mhhossein

Can you tell me why you deleted the file I have uploaded? I can prove that photographer who made a photo for this pianist grants the permission this photo to be used freely. What do you want em to provide, where can I send email (what kind), just let me know. Thanks!Asuas (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Asuas, you have not mentioned the file in question and I can't be precise. However, the file were probably deemed as a violation of the copyright. To prove that every thing is OK with the file, please read the blue box here which begins with "This page gives non-lawyers an overview of complicated copyright laws...". --Mhhossein talk 12:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, again, this is a file I am talking about. Actually Giorgi Latso has sent usage permission to OTRS yesturday, and he got reply already. We will submit one more email about granting to me the permission from Girogi Latso (he owns the copyright eprmission from Helmut Tremmel, photographer) that I can upload this file on wikimedia commons: File:The latsos1.jpj. Also another file has been deleted and I own the permission for this one: File:Giorgi_Latso_giving_masterclasses_at_Moscow_Conservatory_of_Music.jpg What do you suggest to do, so both can be restored? Thank you! Asuas (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Asuas. Sorry for the delay. Get sure the author/copyright holder, not the subject being depicted in the photo, send his/her permission letter to OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 03:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mhhossein. Both are now approved, so it's all ok. I am still awating for one more approval about this this photo I have uploaded yesturday. Actually I need to ask you one question: I made some edits on this photo, so I thought I would resubmit the new one, or can I just reupload it? Thanks again for your help!Asuas (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Every thing is explained here. --Mhhossein talk 08:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:9 Dey 88 demonstrations (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 1989 (talk) 06:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please close. --CptViraj (Talk) 06:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

کارتون

[edit]

سلام. این اثر آلفردو مارتیرنا هرناندز است. Hanooz 00:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hanooz: سلام، ممنون که اطلاع دادید. انجام شد. البته خودتان هم میتوانستید اقدام کنید. باز هم تشکر از توجه شما. --Mhhossein talk 05:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ممنون. چون شما بازبینی کرده بودید گفتم اطلاع بدهم. Hanooz 07:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the file is not visible now.
Also File:CF Baumann - Das Haagthor abgebrochen 1834, Gouache ca1850 Inv.254 (SW232A).jpg
Also File:CF Baumann - Das Ev. Theologische Seminar in Tübingen, Lithographie ca 1840 Inv.9008 (SW220D).jpg
Please corret it! --Mewa767 (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mewa767. I'm opening the files with no difficulties. What do you mean by "visible"? --Mhhossein talk 07:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today is the first file File:CF Baumann - Das Haagthor abgebrochen 1834, Gouache ca1850 Inv.1079 (SW060).jpg OK but the other two aren't visible. Under the file name is only the message "No file available", --Mewa767 (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then please give me the link of the files you can't open now. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 11:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Today are files OK. --Mewa767 (talk) 11:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the move! --Zeugma fr (talk) 11:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Zeugma fr. --Mhhossein talk 13:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

تصویر شهید

[edit]

File:Robert Avedisian Funeral Ceremony 06.jpg سلام لطفا این تصویر را بررسی نماید کاربر برچسب کار مشتق زده است در حالی که تصویر یکی از شهدای جنگ ایران و عراق است بر روی صلیب گل هنگام خاکسپاری وی. [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stan old

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein, Hope you're well,

You probably don't remember but back in February 2019 you blocked Stan old for 2 months for uploading porno images (and essentially treating this as a porno site),
From then till now they'd been uploading normal pictures however this month unfortunately they've gone back to their old ways so I was wondering if you could reblock them for either a longer period of time or failing that indefinitely,
I sort of wonder if we'll be back here next year which is why I'm leaning with indef but it's not the first time I've jumped the gun either,

Anyway hope all is well with you and yours,
Many thanks,
Regards, –Davey2010Talk 21:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Mhhossein talk 17:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mhhossein, You are absolutely amazing thanks ever so much for your help :), I hope you and your family have a wonderful Christmas (or Happy Holidays) and a very Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year,
Thanks again for your help it's greatly appreciated,
Take care,
Kind Regards, Dave /// –Davey2010Talk 22:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, Apologies for bothering you, Could you indef Blackedwhite007 and delete their uploads as it's Stan under a new account, He's had other accounts indeffed in the past due to the exact same behaviour, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome Davey2010. First you need to nominate his uploads for deletion and then please contact the admin who has blocked the former socks. Btw, what are those socks? --Mhhossein talk 22:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies it was only one sock which was Old sat, I thought there was 2 or 3 but could be thinking of someone else completely, Anywya thanks again. –Davey2010Talk 22:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Not only for your help with THAT user but also for your admin (and "non-admin") work across the project both of which are greatly appreciated and most certainly valued too,

I also wish you and your family a wonderful Christmas (or Happy Holidays) and a very Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks Dave /// –Davey2010Talk 22:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: Thanks so much, I wish you a great year, full of joy. --Mhhossein talk 20:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas Mhhossein

Hi Mhhossein, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,
   –Davey2010talk 18:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

تبلیغ

[edit]

سلام این گونه تصاویر بارگزاری کرد نوعی تبلیغ محسوب می شود نظر شما چیست؟ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D9%87%D9%86%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86

[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 21:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست راهنمایی

[edit]

با سلام و احترام. امروز برای حدود 30 تا از تصاویری که آپلود کرده بودم هشدار حذف آمد. در حالی که عکاس همه آن ها خودم بودم. متاسفانه بنده تازه کارم و هنوز با نحوه دفاع کردن از پرونده ها آشنایی ندارم. در صورت امکان ممنون میشم کمی راهنمایی‌ام کنید. / با تجدید اراد Shiasun (talk) 09:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shiasun:   سلام و درود. اگر تصاویر را خودتان گرفته اید و مالک تصاویر نیز خودتان هستید، میتوانید از طریق این لینک فرم مجوز انتشار رایگان را ایجاد کنید و سپس برای او تی آر اس ارسال کنید.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_OTRS_release_generator --Mhhossein talk 18:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to contact OTRS via permissions-commons@wikimedia.org so that you can show you are the photographer of those photos. After you send the emails you will receive a ticket number. --Mhhossein talk 18:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
با سپاس فراوان از راهنمایی های شما استاد عزیز، یک ایمیل از طریق لینکی که فرمودید برای نشانی فوق ارسال کردم. مجددا از لطفتون سپاسگزارم (این هم شماره ای که برای بنده ارسال شد : [Ticket#: 2019122910003251) Shiasun (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, Shiasun. Please wait for reply from OTRS agents. Meanwhile tag your files with {{OTRS pending}} so that others know you have contacted the OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 19:44, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
خیلی ممنون، چه کسی را کجا تگ کنم تا متوجه پیام من بشوند؟ Shiasun (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
نیازی نیست کسی را تگ کنید. الگویی که گفتم را در صفحه تصاویرتان قرار دهید. --Mhhossein talk 06:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
باعرض پوزش به جهت مزاحمت مکرر، اگه براتون مقدور بود به این تصویر نگاهی بکنید و ببینید الگو را در جای مناسبی قرار داده ام؟ Shiasun (talk) 07:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
سلام خواهش میکنم. بله درسته. --Mhhossein talk 16:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
خیلی ممنون از راهنمایی های ارزشمندتون/ با تجدید ارادت Shiasun (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
خواهش میکنم موفق باشید. --Mhhossein talk 18:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

درخواست راهنمایی

[edit]

سلام و عرض ادب/ بنده طبق راهنمایی که از شما گرفتم، ایمیل رو برای ویکی فرستادم. الگو رو هم تو صفحه قرار دادم. ولی همه تصاویر حذف شدند. میشه راهنمایی کنید که الن چه کار باید کنم؟ با تجدید ارادت Shiasun (talk) 03:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shiasun. Maybe you should ask Arthur Crbz why he has deleted your uploads despite your OTRS ticket. --Mhhossein talk 13:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
باز هم از راهنمایی های ارزشمند شما ممنونم/ در صفحه بحث ایشان مطلب را بیان کردم. Shiasun (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
سلام مجدد. در ایمیلی که در جواب من فرستاده شد و متاسفانه به دلیل اینکه در اسپم ایمیلم رفته بود ندیدم. گفته بود با یک ایمیل رسمی مجوز را برایشان ارسال کنم. آیا اگر این کار را الان انجام بدهم امکان احساء تصاویر وجود دارد؟ با احترام Shiasun (talk) 18:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shiasun: Salam. Sure they will, if it is proved the works are yours. No worries for being late! --Mhhossein talk 19:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
خیلی ممنون Shiasun (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
سلام مجدد / یا ایمل رسمی مرکز پژوهشی دانشنامه های حقوقی (که عکسها در آنجا کرفته شده) بک ایمیل اعلام رضایت فرستادم. به شماره (Ticket#: 2020011610003114) / آیا نیاز هست شماره تیکت را در صفحه بحث کسی که تصاویر را حذف کرده بود بفرستم؟ Shiasun (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

تشکرات فراوان

[edit]

سلام و عرض ادب/ بابت راهنمایی های جامع شما سپاسگزارم. با کمک رهنمودهای ارزشمندتون تونستم تصاویر رو احیا کنم/ با تجدید ارادت Shiasun (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shiasun: سلام، خواهش میکنم. بسیار خب. کارهای اصلی را شما انجام دادید. --Mhhossein talk 18:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

دستکاری

[edit]

سلام همکار گرامی در نسخه جدید که توسط Sondrion بارگزاری شده است در نقش دستکاری صورت گرفته است لطفا نقشه به نسخه پیشین ۱۷ سپتامبر ۲۰۱۲ واگردانی شود با تشکر

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Armenian_Diaspora.png&diff=next&oldid=270966804

[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sondrion

تمامی ویرایشات کاربر روی نقشه ها Armenian Dispora

واگردانی شوند و نقشه ها در برابر ویرایش محافظت شوند 

روی تمامی نقشه های مورد نظر دستکاری صورت گرفته است [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 21:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Sciences: سلام تغییرات ایجاد شده قابل توجه محسوب میشوند؟ آیا بر سر این تغییرات اختلاف وجود دارد؟ --Mhhossein talk 12:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

کاربر دستکاری کننده یک کاربر زاپاس باز بوده است که تمامی حساب هایش بسته شده است بله با تغییرات ایجاد کرده و نسخه جدید بارگزاری آمارهای جمعیتی روی نقشه ها را دستکاری کرده است لطفا آنها را به نسخه پیشین واگردانی نماید نسخه کاربر غیرواقعی و جعلی است با تشکر [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 16:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

برخی توسط افراد دیگر نیز ویرایش شده بودند. مابقی را به نسخه اولیه برگرداندم. --Mhhossein talk 13:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

تشکر بابت ویرایش هایتان

بی زحمت دسترسی کاربر در ویکی انبار گرفته شود و چون که نقشه های مهمی هستند و در مقالات بسیاری استفاده شده اند نقشه ها در برابر ویرایش (درسطح ویرایشی کاربرتاییدشده پایدار) بی پایان محافظت شوند با تشکر پیشاپیش [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

سلام به کاربر تذکر خواهم داد. اما محتفظت از صفخات در شرایط خاص صورت میگیرد معمولا. البته میتوانید از مدیران دیگر نیز درخواست داشته باشید. --Mhhossein talk 17:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ballam Park Homestead

[edit]

Do we have to discuss whether we feel like continuing to publish unambiguously copyrighted material after it's brought to our attention now, or is that just your way of doing things? The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear The Drover's Wife. The file would be deleted speedily if you had provided the clue showing the file is an infringement. Anyway, thanks, I will do the job. --Mhhossein talk 11:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creation-protect

[edit]

Hi Mhhossein, Not sure if creation-protection is a thing here but if it is then should File:Mia Khalifa.jpg be creation protected, Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010Talk 12:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: The developments of the history for that file is exceptional. That's why I have already tried to seek a feedback from Túrelio. --Mhhossein talk 12:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Mhhossein, Given File:وجدي غنيم.jpg and File:Eliana.jpg both used to have the same issue and both have been protected I don't see why this file should be any different - Not having a go btw just saying,
That being said I've just tried uploading a file under a protected file and got "This title corresponds to a protected page on this wiki. Please choose a different one." so basically if protected all's the users would do is enter a more descriptive name meaning the copyvios will go more undetected,
So maybe for the sake of spotting copyvios easier maybe it'd be better to keep as is,
It's a tough one tbh, Anyway thanks for your help! :), Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: Thanks for the comment. I concur with you saying the current status helps us detect the copyvios much easier. You can see Túrelio has also suggested to "live with this phenomenon"! But I believe we can do something with such files. How about listing them somewhere so that we can check them from time to time? --Mhhossein talk 05:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:A bikini barista in Clovis, Ca.jpg

[edit]

I took this pic from my own camera phone, which includes the GPS coordinates of where it was taken thus did not violate the copyright. I am offend of this accusation when there is a piece of evidence that it was taken by me. If you really found the pic similar it is coincidental.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

حذف

[edit]

سلام لطفا آخرین نسخه File:Bagratuni Armenia 1000-hy.svg

بارگزاری شده توسط بنده که نصف فارسی و نصف ارمنی هستند حذف شود اشتباهی بارگزاری شد با تشکرLuckie Luke (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luckie Luke سلام گرامی، انجام شد. لطفا من بعد دقت بیشتری داشته باشید. --Mhhossein talk 13:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question on photo deletion

[edit]

Hey @Mhhossein: ! You deleted File:Annamie Paul in Toronto Regent Park.jpg for copyright violation, but this identical photo still exists Annamie Paul in Regent Park Toronto.jpg. I think that in both of these cases, it is likely that the subject owns the rights by having paid for the photoshoot (although I can't be sure), but independent of that I wanted to know if I could put the still existing photo into pages. Thank you! TimeEngineer (talk) 16:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TimeEngineer: The other photo is also going to be deleted for the same reason I deleted yours. --Mhhossein talk 06:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. The original one wasn't mine either, but sure. TimeEngineer (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

حذف تمام تصاویر

[edit]

تمام تصاویر من در ویکی انبار توسط ربات حذف شده خواهش میکنم بررسی بفرمایید بیش از نود درصد تصاویر رو من ایجاد کردم و تعداد کمی از تصاویر که من ایجاد نکرده‌ام منبع پدید آورندشو ذکر کردم ممنون میشم بررسی بفرمایید. Arioferdows (talk) 16:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arioferdows: سلام. تصاویر شما توسط ربات حذف نشده اند. بلکه پس از راه اندازی یک نظرخواهی، توسط یک مدیر حذف شده اند. --Mhhossein talk 06:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mhhossein:ممنون که جوابمو دادید حالا راه حلی هست تا تصاویر حذف شده رو بازیابی کرد

من خیلی زحمت کشیدم واسه عکسا 🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arioferdows (talk • contribs) 09:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Arioferdows: سلام. اگر عکاس این عکسها خودتان هستید باید بتوانید نسخه اصلی فایلها را به سامانه او تی آرس ارسال کنید و ثابت کنید که آثار مربوط به خودتان است. --Mhhossein talk 06:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mhhossein‌: تعدادی از عکسارو من با گوشی همراه قبلی گرفتم در مورد چند مورد دیگه مثل سفرنامه ناصر خسرو من تصویر این سفرنامه رو با فتوشاپ ایجاد کردم ولی متاسفانه فایل پی دی افشو پاک کردم مثل چند تا دیگه عکس دیگه که با فتوشاپ و کنار هم قرادادن عکسا ایجاد کردم چند مورد دیگه رو هم با ذکر منبع مانند سایت و یا منبع اینستاگرامی یا تلگرامیش ذکر کردم خواهش میکنم اون بخشی از عکسارو که مربوط به خودم هستش برگردونید. حدود صد و ده عکس از من حذف شده که نیمی از عکسا رو خودم ایجاد کردم متاسفانه خیلی به صورت سختگیرانه تمام عکسای من که بیشتر تاریخی بوده حذف شده بازم خواهش میکنم تلاشتون رو به عنوان یکی از مدیران ویکی انبار انجام بدید به هر حال ممنونم باعث وقتی که گذاشتید.Arioferdows (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
اسلام دوباره. عکسهایی که خودتان تهیه کردید را از طریق همان سامانه اثبات کنید مربوط به شماست. کار با سامانه را بلد هستید؟ این صفحه را مطالعه نموده اید؟ --Mhhossein talk 13:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mhhossein‌:سلام من مطالب رو خوندم ولی متوجه نشدم باید کجا اثبات کنم که اثر مربوط به خودمه میشه راهنمایی بفرمایید آیا باید با زبان انگلیسی ثابت کرد ممنون🖐️ Arioferdows (talk) 15:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Arioferdows: سلام میتونید به زبان فارسی هم ارسال کنید. ولی انگلیسی باشه بهتره. پیشنهاد میکنم از این ابزار استفاده کنید برای ایجاد متن رضایت نامه. .--Mhhossein talk 11:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
در واقع فرمی که با آن ابزار ایجاد میکنید را به آدرسی که انتهای متن گذاشته ام ارسال کنید. عکسهایی که با گوشی خودتان گرفته اید جای دیگر که منتشر نشده اند؟ permissions-commons@wikimedia.org --Mhhossein talk 12:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent photo deletion

[edit]

Am I curious as to why this photo I uploaded was deleted. A separate user requested the image be deleted, but erroneously reported that it originated on Facebook and additional permissions were required. This is incorrect; I am the original author of the photo in question and I have uploaded dozens of concert pics in the past without experiencing this. Was there something I should have done to ensure that this pic wasn't removed? Carbrera (talk) 14:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, you need to PROVE you're the author via contacting the OTRS agents. Also, with this user name, i.e. Carbrera, I am not seeing "concert pics" being uploaded by you. --Mhhossein talk 13:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas Mhhossein

Hi Mhhossein, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and healthy New Year,
Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,
   –Davey2010talk 18:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: Many thanks for the nice words. I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas in this adverse period. Stay safe. --Mhhossein talk 16:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're more than welcome and thank you for your kind words too, Lets hope 2021 is a much better year!. Take care and stay safe mate, All the best, Dave // –Davey2010Talk 17:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

[edit]

Dear Mhhossein

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

[edit]

Hello Mhhossein,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for letting me know. ----Mhhossein talk 13:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:George Hare Philipson 1917.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 21:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File:SET AAB-665 057-TS head 20210925a.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G7 (Author or uploader request deletion))

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Solomon203.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemiya

[edit]

Salam,

Its VR from English wikipedia. I want to know if I can use a company's logo as free-use. Does policy allow that? We were previously discussing this here.Vice regent (talk) 05:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Vice regent, Wikipedia:Logos#Uploading non-free logos is explaining how you can upload and use the company's logo. But briefly, if the logo is not free you can upload that only to Wikipedia provided that the file is "low-resolution and no larger than necessary". Needless to mention that Wikimedia Commons files should be completely free. However, if you have access to the copyright holder you may ask them grant the permission using this guideline. --Mhhossein talk 17:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that copyright policies for wikimedia were different from wikipedia. What about this image and this one? Is it ok to upload screenshots of google? An admin on wikipedia asked me to ask here.Vice regent (talk) 05:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please find Commons:Screenshots#Web browsers. I don't think they are free but I recommend you to reassure by asking this at COM:VPC. --Mhhossein talk 12:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I just uploaded the image to commons because I think it does not meet the threshold for originality[6]. Is it ok?Vice regent (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Vice regent. That seems OK to me. That is below COM:TOO. Best. --Mhhossein talk 11:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Khost children in 2010.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, what a good news. But I just renamed it. --Mhhossein talk 05:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


بررسی

[edit]

سلام همکار گرامی تصاویر بارگزاری شده توسط کاربر زیر را بنگرید

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7 https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7&dir=prev&offset=20130402140515&limit=500&target=%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7


برای نمونه

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87_%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B3_%DB%8C%DA%A9%D9%85.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87_%D8%B7%D9%87%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A8_%DB%8C%DA%A9%D9%85.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B4%DB%8C_%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%87.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%B9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AE_%D9%85%DB%8C%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%A7_%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%AE%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%84.pdf


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C_%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%DA%AF%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bookbinding_entertainment_MAD_27659_n2.jpg


اکثرشان نقاشی هستند یا تصاویری هستند که وبسایت های برداشته که کامنز اصلا نداشتند

موارد بالا برای نمونه بود [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 01:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Modern Sciences:
تصاویر با مجوز دامنه عمومی بارگزاری شده اند لذا اگر این مدعا درست باشد تصاویر رایگان محسوب میشوند. اگر فکر میکنید 30 سال از انتشار این تصاویر نمیگذرد میتوانید برای حذفشان اقدام بفرمایید. --Mhhossein talk 06:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

سلام و عرض ادب درباره این فایل، عکس مربوط به نخل‌برداری در شهر مهریز است. در صفحه بحث چند مورد مدرک درباره این اشتباه آوردم که متاسفانه بررسی نشده یا بهرحال مورد قبول واقع نشده، در ضمن عرض کردم من خودم ساکن تفت هستم و چندین بار در این مراسم شرکت کردم!!! جهت اطمینان بیشتر می‌تونید به این [7] که البته سمت دیگر نخل مهریز را نشان می‌دهد نگاه بیاندازید و به وضوح اسم تکیه باغ بهار مهریز در عکس مشخص است. در این نخل از پوش آینه استفاده شده. نخل تفت اما پوش متفاوتی دارد. این [8] در آپارات فیلم هر دو مراسم وجود دارد. با تشکر

سلام، عکاسی که تصاویر را برای بارگزاری در اختیار من گذاشت گفت مربوط به شهر تفت است. شما اگر بتوانید نشان بدهید دقیقا همین نخل در شهر مهریز گردانده میشود بهتر میتوان تصمیم گرفت. پوش نخل ممکن است دلیل قانع کننده ای نباشد. --Mhhossein talk 18:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
درباره این که این عکس مربوط به نخل‌برداری تفت نیست مطمئن باشید.
این فیلم از یوتیوب رو میتونید مشاهده بفرمایید [9]
نخل برداری تفت در تکیه شاهولی برگزار میشه که دوطبقه نیست اما تکیه ای که در عکس مشخص هست دو طبقه هست این نخل پنج یا شش ردیف چوب داره، اما نخل تفت حدود ده ردیف داره، نخل تفت رو روی دوش میذارن اما همونطور که در عکس مشخصه این نخل رو روس دست حمل میکنن
سرچ گوگل عکس از نماهای متفاوت نخل تفت رو مشخص میکنه [10]
اما بهرحال عکس یه مقدار با نخل مهریز هم متفاوته که احتمالا به خاطر اینه که از زاویه متفاوت گرفته شده Msalehdt (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
اشتباه میکردم، عکس مربوط به نخل برداری شهر زارچه
خبر آنلاین: [11] ایسنا: [12] فارس نیوز: [13] خبرگزاری قرآن: [14]
به چینش آینه‌ها توجه کنید، در عکس هایی که از جلوی نخل گرفته شده از هر کدوم از منابعی که ارسال کردم دقیقا مطابقه، پرچم های دو طرف نخل ، علم های بالای نخل، تعداد ردیف های چوب، حمل روی دست، پارچه سبزرنگ محیط نخل، کلک وسط تکیه که در گوشه تصویر مشخص است، معماری تکیه، حتی تیر چراغ برق کلک وسط حسینیه که گوشه بالای سمت راست مشخصه و با عکس از فارس نیوز منطبقه
فکر میکنم واضح باشه دیگه :) Msalehdt (talk) 19:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
سلام، بله با شما موافقم که این تصویر مربوط به همان مکانی است که پیدا کردید. پیگیری شما قابل تحسین است. --Mhhossein talk 19:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas Mhhossein

Hi Mhhossein, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and healthy New Year,
Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,
   –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
Thank you Davey. I wish you a great 2022. --Mhhossein talk 07:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users

[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Johan (WMF): Thanks for the heads up. --Mhhossein talk 09:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How does PD work exactly?

[edit]

Salam,

Sorry for the silly question but how exactly does PD work? Is it that an image automatically becomes PD after a certain period of time (depending on the country its in)? Is it measured after the work is created, after it is published, or after its author passes away? Vice regent (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salam, Vice regent. The question is not silly at all, since there are not many users knowing the exact concept of PD, i.e. Public Domain. PD works are allowed to be uploaded here and the whether or not a work is in PD, primarily depends on the local regulations of the corresponding countries. You can find more info at Commons:Copyright rules by territory – where you just need to opt the country you'd like to know about its PD situation. --Mhhossein talk 09:52, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As for the last question, there are usually multiple criteria for determining a PD.--Mhhossein talk 10:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that link. I see that Template PD-Iraq[15] includes as PD "photographic or cinematic work that is not compositive (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999". But nothing about the 1999 rule can be found at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iraq, why is that? Vice regent (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome Vice regent. Maybe you need to see Template:PD-Iraq. I think you can't find "1999" in the original texts of Iraqi copyright laws, rather you may notice a specific duration being defined. Usually, the duration passed from the 'publication' is considered as the criteria. So, this "1999" will change to "2000" next year. --Mhhossein talk 02:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File restore request

[edit]
Dear Mhhossein, I am writing to you to request that you undelete the image of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Newman_Oltman_Guitar_Duo_Under_Tree.jpg. This file, which was uploaded to upload wizard on January 16 2022 by me from https://www.guitar was deleted by you on January 17 2022 because the copyright holder had not submitted the license approval. The copyright holder is photographer Lisa-Marie Mazzucco. On January 17 2022 Lisa submitted her agreement to approve of the use of the photo under a creative commons license. This is what she wrote to photosubmission@wikimedia.org: I hereby affirm that I, Lisa-Marie Mazzucco, am the creator and/or sole owner of
the exclusive copyright of the following media work:
content attached to this email
I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a
commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs,
provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable
laws.
I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as
well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen.
Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the
copyright holder.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or
may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Lisa-Marie Mazzucco
2022-01-17
On January 18 2022 Alfred Neumann from Wikimedia Foundation wrote back telling Lisa "Dear Lisa Mazzucco,
Thank you for your permission to use media file(s) on Wikimedia Commons.
For us to process your contribution(s), we need to know the specific name or URL of the page(s) on Wikimedia Commons to which you have uploaded them, or the user name used to upload.
If you have not yet uploaded, please continue to upload the file(s) and let us know when done. When you reach the second page of Upload Wizard, you should select "This file is not my own work" (even if it is your own work) and put {{Permission pending|year=2022|month=February|day=23}} in the Source field to mark the file as awaiting processing.
If the file(s) were deleted, please do not attempt to re-upload them; they will be automatically restored by an administrator upon successful confirmation of permission.
Sincerely,
Alfred Neumann
--
Wikimedia Foundation - https://wikimediafoundation.org/
Press room: https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_room
As per Mr. Neumann's instructions, I have not reuploaded the photo since he assured Lisa it will be automatically restored by an administer upon successful confirmation of permission. Lisa was told the approval could take up to 10 days, but she has not heard anything yet, and it has been over a month. Could you please check on the status of her permission and restore the photo at your earliest convenience or let me know why it cannot by restored? Thank you AnnRos (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear AnnRos. I am not sure why I had missed your request. Sorry for the delay. You may make your undeletion request at COM:UNDEL since I can not affirm if the permission request has been successfully confirmed. --Mhhossein talk 04:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

نقض حق تکثیر

[edit]

سلام همکار گرامی تمامی بارگزاری های این کاربر از وبسایت هایی که حق تکثیر دارند بارگزاری شده است لطفا تصاویر را بررسی نماید با تشکر [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

سلام و درود، ظاهرا یک مدیر دیگر چند روز پیش فایلهای این کاربر را بررسی کرده و برایش پیغام گذاشته است. --Mhhossein talk 05:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mhhossein,

thank you for the Renaming-Link. Point 2 of the table in File renaming#Which files should not be renamed? shows names, that are similar to my request. Since 2020 it exists a second Honda CBR 1000 RR SP, so from my point of view the file name is ambiguous. Please rename. Thank you in advance. KR, Wikisympathisant (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikisympathisant, can you show me the other file having a similar name please? --Mhhossein talk 05:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the CBR 1000 RR is built since 1992 in ten generations, all these motorcycles has the same name - you can see that in the category (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Honda_CBR1000RR). I checked the type SP, which is built in 3rd generation now. In this sense the name is ambigous, I don't see a violation of the renaming rules ... Regards, --Wikisympathisant (talk) 07:36, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanations Wikisympathisant. But does not the term 'SP' make it recognizable from other gernations of Honda CBR 1000 RR? --Mhhossein talk 06:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for your answer, your thought is not completely right, the SP has three generations ... KR, Wikisympathisant (talk) 14:15, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Wikisympathisant --Mhhossein talk 04:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CSD F3

[edit]

Just a reminder, photos taken in a public place are ineligible for speedy deletion (unless the photo itself was stolen). In this case it happened to be a close call where there is room for disagreement, but note that a DR is required even for "obvious" cases such as a centered photo of a modern public sculpture in the US. -- King of ♥ 05:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: Plz communicate on this specific matter via the deletion page. Best. --Mhhossein talk 06:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't want to clutter up the DR with the minutia of speedy deletion policy, which is no longer relevant to whether this particular image gets deleted since it's already moved on to DR. As long as you're aware for future speedy deletions, it's all good. -- King of ♥ 06:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative of copyrighted works are clear violations and hence prone to speedy. Just for your information, the work which is up for deletion, contains copyrighted portions. It's not permanently in public as required by COM:FOP, so should be deleted. --Mhhossein talk 06:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, thanks for the tip, King of Hearts. Works in public would better be handled via DR as F3 suggests. --Mhhossein talk 06:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check mail

[edit]

Please check ur email. Thanks MehdiTalk 15:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Mehdi, OK, thanks for reaching out. --Mhhossein talk 06:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Complicated case of copyright issues are best handled at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Mhhossein talk 06:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

راهنمایی

[edit]

سلام. آیا این تصویر قابل ماندن است یا با استناد به ازادی پانوراما جزو مجسمه و پیکره محسوب میشود و باید حذف نمود؟ ایا ماکت مستثنی از مجسمه و پیکره است یا در همان دسته بندی گنجانده میشود؟ با سپاس MehdiTalk 08:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

file moves when pages are transcluded at WSes

[edit]

Hi. File moves like this cause problems at the Wikisources where pages are transcribed (ie. Page: ns pages showing in global usage). Can I suggest that you decline the moves as CommonsDelinker cannot fix and it just causes the WSes issues to have to clean up. The guidance to admins about moves gives us the ability to decline.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]