Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,610 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,018 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,098 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,494 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MasterRus21thCentury (talk) on 2024-07-02 23:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Belovezh Accords
Used in:
Беловежские соглашения
Reason:
The moment of signing the agreements that legally formalized the collapse of the USSR. On December 8, 1991, a new era began in world history. -- MasterRus21thCentury (talk)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-05 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Luigi Zandomeneghi - Alvise Contarini‎ in Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia Venice
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-07-05 09:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Front view of the building Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora do Rosário - Curuçá
Used in:
‍Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora do Rosário
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-07-05 09:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Front view of the building Escola Estadual Antônio Grohs - Mato Grosso
Used in:
‍Escola Estadual Antônio Grohs
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-05 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Mers-les-Bains le balcon et les céramiques de la Villa Pomone, view from Esp. du Général Leclerc
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-05 15:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Front of the Kapelle St. Johannes Baptista (Vulpera) Special mural with biblical motif.
Reason:
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MasterRus21thCentury (talk) on 2024-07-05 17:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Viktor Yushchenko, portrait photograph
Used in:
Ющенко, Виктор Андреевич
Reason:
Another of the official portraits of Ukrainian presidents posted on Wikimedia Commons in 2022. Unlike his successor Yanukovych, under Yushchenko the official portrait was approved twice - in 2005 after the Orange Revolution, and in 2008 (the same one) against the backdrop of the Ukrainian flag and the presidential standard. -- MasterRus21thCentury (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-07-05 18:04 (UTC)
Scope:
SME PLAT-I horizontal, in-stream, tidal energy generator
Reason:

When I originally made this image, I did not know what was this strange device floating in the harbor. I subsequently discovered that it is one of the many attempts at renewable tidal power generation using a horizontal, in-stream, turbine design.
What distinguishes this device is that it attempts to be a power supply focused at a community level (no large infrastructure required) and was constructed by a local builder of lobster boats.

While the developer, Sustainable Marine Energy, has subsequently floundered financially, this image has value documenting one of the many attempts of renewable tidal power generation. -- GRDN711 (talk)
 Comment I thought it would be helpful to provide wider image as context for the function of this tidal energy generator. Still, you raise a good point for VI. I have cropped the imagte more tightly to the device. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better now. --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment El Golli Mohamed - based on your cancelled oppose, have changed the status back to "nominated" and seek further support for this nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Günther Frager (talk) on 2024-07-05 18:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Alicia Alonso
Used in:
en:Alicia Alonso

 Support --Thi (talk) 08:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-07-05 19:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Norwegian buoy/lighthouse maintenance vessel, Traenen - IMO 7607106
Reason:
Best view of this ship by name. There is another image with a port profile view but this one from the stern, clearly shows all features of the ship, with workers. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Skander zarrad (talk) on 2024-07-05 18:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Water buffalo (Water buffalo)

 Comment Your scope needs to be in the format described in COM:VIS Domain-specific scope guidelines for animals. I would read the entire page on scopes. It is useful --GRDN711 (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I read the page, what do think about it now Skander zarrad (talk) 21:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Your scope is currently two vernacular names and not valid. Does your image represent the Bubalus bubalis species? Per COM:VIS (read again and look to others on this page as examples for guidance), the domain-specific scope guidelines for animals, advises scopes to be in the form of scientific name in italic format (vernacular name in round brackets), followed by subscope if appapropriate. The word "herd" might be a reasonable sub-scope in this case, separating it from single animals.
The purpose is to keep the VI nomination system rational and ordered for the future. . --GRDN711 (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Skander zarrad (talk) on 2024-07-05 18:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Sphingonotus (Sphingonotus)
Used in:

 Comment Your scope needs to be in the format described in COM:VIS Domain-specific scope guidelines for animals (look at other insect scopes on this page for guidance). --GRDN711 (talk) 19:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment it is ok now ? Skander zarrad (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Your scope is currently two scientific names. I beleve the Sphingonotu genus is called the "Blue-winged grasshopper" as a vernacular name in English. Read my previous comments on animal scope formats (apply to insects as well) and look to other examples of insect nominations on this page. There appear to be 122 sub-genus levels of this grasshopper. If you can narrow the image scope down to the sub-genus level, this would help this nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-05 22:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Ranginui (the sky father), view in Sudima Lake Rotorua (New Zealand)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-06 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Cardites floridanus var. albus (Broad-ribbed Cardita), right valve
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-06 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Luigi Zandomeneghi - Niccolò Marcello‎ in Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-06 04:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Hard Rock Cafe in Bacino Orseolo Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-06 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Arturo Martini - Allegory of the Sea - Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-06 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden door of the Reformierte Kirche San Bastian (Zernez)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-06 19:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Tapirus terrestris (South American tapir) swimming
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-07-07 02:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Tugboat, Barbados II - IMO 9229221 – starboard side view
Reason:
Best starboard profile view of this ship by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-07-07 04:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Taxodium distichum (swamp cyprus) - knees
  •  Comment When you say "cultivated", do you mean that a plant of the Taxodium distichum (bald cyprus) tree was taken from its natural wet environment of the in the southern US and Mississippi Valley and re-planted in the Famberhorst Nature Reserve in Joure, Netherlands? Or is it a "cultivar" where a plant is cultivated over several plant generations for certain traits? --GRDN711 (talk) 18:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment A plant transplanted to the Nethwerlands and cultivated still retains the genetic print of the species. Cultivars are more questionable.
Your image is technically excellent and while there are others (many by you), this one (focus stacked, wet, with greenery on top like a hat) stands out. However, the scope seems too descriptive. IMO, something simpler, closer to "Taxodium distichum (swamp cyprus) - knees" would be better in keeping with COM:VIS guidelines and others on this page. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-07 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Cardites floridanus var. albus (Broad-ribbed Cardita), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-07 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Pescaria (Venice) - Oak wood ceiling
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-07 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Hommage à Chagall - Bronze - Musée Goya

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-07 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Arturo Martini - Self-portrait
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-07 09:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Waharoa by Neke Kapua in museum Te Papa Tongarewa Wellington (N.Z)
Used in:
Global usage

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-07 17:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro (N400) - right front view
Used in:
de:Toyota Tacoma, de:Toyota New Global Architecture, en:Toyota Tacoma
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-07 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW F39 X2 M35i - right front view
Used in:
de:BMW F39
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-07 17:37 (UTC)
Scope:
XPeng G9 Performance - left rear view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-07-07 19:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Colias croceus (Clouded yellow)
Used in:
Global usage
Thank you Agnes. This photo was chosen twice as Photo of the Day (in two different languages). :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-07-07 19:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Podiceps cristatus (Great crested grebe) performing a courtship display
  •  Comment There scope you chose might be too broad and image would have a low chance of succeeding, especially since the category and its subcategories have a high file count. I suggest you include the subspecies of the animal or it's behavior in the scope. --Zzzs (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I added "performing a courtship display". Thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-07-07 19:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Alauda arvensis harterti (Eurasian skylark)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-08 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Loripinus fragilis, right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-08 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Fountain with animal sculptures. (Pigeon) n Trier by an unknown artist.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-08 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Hekateion with charites - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-08 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Arturo Martini - Fanciulla piena d'amore - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-08 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Vincent of Saragossa by Juan de la Abadia - Musée Goya‎ Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-08 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus ocularis ocularis (Spectacled weaver) male
Added the supported mention,--Pierre André (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-08 14:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Glenea fasciata (Longhorn beetle)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-08 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Anoplocnemis curvipes (Leaf-wilter) mating (female on left)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-08 18:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota Tacoma (N400) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Toyota Tacoma
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-08 18:25 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW U10 X2 M35i - left rear view
Used in:
de:BMW U10
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-08 18:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Opel Combo E (Facelift) Cargo - right front view
Used in:
de:Opel, de:Opel Combo, en:Citroën Berlingo, en:Opel Combo, uk:Opel Combo

 Comment There are several other right front views in the CAT that are better than the nom. Many are 2018. Is this image from 2023 visually distinct? If so, you may like to create a sub-cat for 2023 and make the scope more specific. --Tagooty (talk) 03:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Tagooty: thanks for your review, I created a sub-category.--Alexander-93 (talk) 16:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral I am confused: from the , it appears that a single model has been produced from 2018-present, so what is the sub-cat? I leave it to others who are more familiar with these car models to decide. Tagooty (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-09 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Het Verborgen Rijk van Ming. Decorative door panels. Chinese garden in the hortus in Haren (Groningen).
  • Answer: Almost all the materials used to build the Chinese garden were shipped from China to the Netherlands, and these panels in the doors of the Moaning Dragon Teahouse are also wood carvings from the Ming dynasty.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-09 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Loripinus fragilis, left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-09 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Dama in rosa 1888 - Vittorio Matteo Corcos
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-09 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Still life with cabbag - Spanish school Musée Goya, Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-09 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Maine entrance of Biblioteca Nazinale Marciana in Venice
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-09 09:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Wellington.- Statue of Kupe Raiatea, his wife Te Aparangi and tohunga Pekahourangi (Close-up)), view from Taranaki Street Wharf (NZ)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-09 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Frontispiece of the memorial gateway in Māori village of Whakarewarewa, view from Tryon Street (NZ)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-09 16:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Opel Combo E (Facelift) Cargo - right rear view
Used in:
de:Opel Combo
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-09 21:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Maori wood carving pencil box representing Rangi and Papa with inset Pāua shell eyes, (NZ)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-10 04:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Stained glass window in the Kapelle St. Johannes Baptista (Vulpera) Biblical scene.
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"