Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 05:34:46
- Info The rather tinted paper was definitely pulling this image down, as well as some bleedthrough and a fold line (with some mirroring across the fold line). Also, it wasn't actually the largest version available at the source, but I think that's an uncontroversial sort of change, even for an FP, so I just updated it. New version will need my name added as restorer on the page, but that's not a big deal, I don't think. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hohemarkenbusch, Baumstamm -- 2024 -- 4411 (kreativ 2).jpg
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 17:43:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional_camera_movement_(ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 17:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 17:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you explain what this image is about? Wolverine XI 21:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info In short: photographic art as described. In long: Explaining photographic art is certainly not easy, but I can say something about how it came about. The motif was a tree trunk with a varied structure - with different shades of green and brown. This tree trunk was photographed using the "Intentional camera movement" technique, so that the corresponding movement effect was created. The direction of movement of the camera was parallel to the tree trunk. The exposure time was chosen so that the structure of the trunk was still preserved. (It was only an exposure time of 0.6 seconds, so not too little and not too much). In post-processing, the image was edited so that the contrasts were emphasized and at the same time the colors were made a little more saturated. The resulting image was the basis for the image shown here. In the final step, the image was duplicated (in 2 layers) and one layer was mirrored in order to achieve the symmetry effect. Both layers were then blended together so that the dark tones were dominant. --XRay 💬 04:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 14:44:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 08:54:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Cairina
- Info: feral Muscovy ducks at Capitão Lake, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but the quality nor the composition is good enough for FP. Wolverine XI 21:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 08:43:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Capelinhos volcano and the lighthouse damaged by its 1957 eruption; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support At the first glance one may think: “Meh – everything is grey and brown, weather and light are dull”. But in this case the brown colours and the overcast sky combine to an impressive atmosphere – the whole place looks like in some dystopic sci-fi movie. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose: Meh – everything is grey and brown, weather and light are dullSupport --Zzzs (talk) 11:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 14:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo reminded me of a beautiful photo of mine taken in Cornwall, but yours is better... --Terragio67 (talk) 15:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 08:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
- Info An oxpecker playing hide-and-seek? One giraffe head shot FP from some time ago. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice. There are at least 3 dust spots -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. All removed I hope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes. The hidden bird with red beak is the little extra gift -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yet another classic animal of the African bush. Wolverine XI 21:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 07:56:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Lacertidae (True Lizards)
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good for 1". Good WB and colors. Some "mistake" annoted. --Mile (talk) 08:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent El Golli Mohamed 14:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good. --August Geyler (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 07:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created & uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 06:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Viperidae (Vipers)
- Info created by Gopala Krishna A - uploaded by Gopala Krishna A - nominated by Gopala Krishna A -- Gopala Krishna A (talk) 06:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gopala Krishna A (talk) 06:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting is unappealing in my eyes. Wolverine XI 21:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 21:18:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Brazil
- Info Largo do Pelourinho, Salvador, Bahia, a World Heritage Site in Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 21:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If you crop bottom shadow part out, might be more interesting. --Mile (talk) 08:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Info Cropped version added. ★ 12:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could go with both. --Mile (talk) 14:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is better El Golli Mohamed 14:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 13:52:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Oculus window, Convento do Carmo de Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different and well-captured. -- ★ 13:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question Don't you have two other active nominations? --Zzzs (talk) 14:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- I just withdrew the mobile phone nominee. ★ ★ 14:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question Don't you have two other active nominations? --Zzzs (talk) 14:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question to Prburley: you're an excellent photographer, how can we have some kind of contact with you? ★ 14:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even if the quality is not very very good, I like it El Golli Mohamed 19:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurred outside detracts for me. Greater DoF would help. --Tagooty (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-done composition. As the subject is the window, the outside is rightly out of focus – if the houses were in focus, too, the beautiful window grating would be almost unrecognizable. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --August Geyler (talk) 08:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 04:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Iridaceae
- Info Flower buds in development of a Crocosmia 'Lucifer' (Montbretia). Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Precise! Wolverine XI 19:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Harmonious structure with high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition, exceptional detail when zoomed in. --Tagooty (talk) 04:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful shapes. – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 03:55:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much noises --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I can't find any significant image noise. However, the object the butterfly is resting on appears to be out of focus. --Zzzs (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah, the blurry brown thing is quite annoying. Wolverine XI 19:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Bait put out to attract the butterflies. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 21:52:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Volga Federal District
- Info Trees in the snow on the slope of Mount Shudya-Pendysh in the Northern Urals on a winter day / Created by Dendaris - uploaded by Dendaris - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is this a night shot? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Overprocessed? Underexposed? ★ 03:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it is, somehting looks off with the light and colours. I would rule out a night shot because of the shadows. Kritzolina (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- It was taken at 12:30, so… ★ 21:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the shadows, I think the timestamp might not be correct, but we can't be sure Kritzolina (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- It was taken at 12:30, so… ★ 21:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it is, somehting looks off with the light and colours. I would rule out a night shot because of the shadows. Kritzolina (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Overprocessed? Underexposed? ★ 03:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Strong vignetting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too dark for my liking. Wolverine XI 19:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I really like the atmosphere of this photo as well as the colorsEl Golli Mohamed 19:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose but the vignetting blew it --Zzzs (talk) 08:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 21:31:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Others
- Info The spiracle of a butterfly pupa in a scanning electron microscope / Created by Gribkov - uploaded by Gribkov - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 21:12:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info We have seven FPs of the jaguar (two in zoos). All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are a problem with a category --Wilfredor (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Error caused by WLE Brazil upload bot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm still waiting for the Brazilian issue. ★ 22:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment his face and more precisely at the level of the eyes and cheeks it is a little blurry and it lacks contrast, it looks like it was taken through a window, it is not sharp. It isn't even a QI El Golli Mohamed 22:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Over processed, noisy image. Sorry--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- + those green grasses are distracting --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The fur has a strange texture, probably processing artefacts. The pose is not exciting compared to the FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Many details are lost, noise → ISO 3200. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 14:09:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States
- Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 14:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 14:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Something is missing, but I'm not sure what. Wolverine XI 19:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- agree --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 02:07:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Caricatures
- Info created by Honoré Daumier - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Notable work of art. I also like the humour. Yann (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and good quality, famous lithographer, famous photographer, inspiring drawing :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of a famous caricature. – Aristeas (talk) 07:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 21:09:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Gastropoda
- Info Variable neon slug (Nembrotha kubaryana), Anilao, Philippines. This species occurs in the tropical Western Indo-Pacific and can reach a total length of 12 centimetres (4.7 in). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Typical. Wolverine XI 22:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support sharp! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Night club --Zzzs (talk) 00:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sci-fi extraterrestrial creature couldn't have more funky colors and shapes -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support An impressive creature. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support How bizzare! --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well this one is more in focus. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile. Yann (talk) 14:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! --Tagooty (talk) 04:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 18:43:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)
- Info created and uploaded by Ezra Sheyner - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is CA. Quality is good but not outstanding. The environment is also strange, this bird is not a fisher. Poco a poco (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- CommentI don't know if that is my problem,I found the bird's eyes are out of focus--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 17:08:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cerambycidae (Longhorned Beetles)
- Info created and uploaded by Didier Descouens, nominated by Yann
- Info Titan beetle (Titanus giganteus), one of the largest known insects, at over 170 mm (6.7 in) in length. From French Guiana.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks to Yann for this delicate attention... it seems you can eat it... I haven't tried it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent technical quality, sharp and with a high resolution. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Crunchy! --Zzzs (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:14, 7 July 2024
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 16:58:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by Marion Post Wolcott, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Info Mr. R. B. Whitley visiting in his general store, Wendell, Wake County, North Carolina, September 1939. Picture from the US Farm Security Administration. Photographer's comment: He was one of the first citizens of the town and is one of its leading citizens, owner of the general store, president of the bank, and owns a cotton mill nearby, and a farm. He is a big land owner, owns Whitley-Davis farm and a cotton mill in Clayton. He said he cut down the trees and pulled the stumps out of the main street, and was the first man in that town of Wendell.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 12:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Walls
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral As nominator -- August Geyler (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- RequestMay you explain more about what picture is telling?--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- You are asking about the Letters and signs? I don't know anything about them. The Arabic numbers were written on each stone for reinstallation. The historic wall (part of an old railway bridge) was demolished to build an new bridge with a new wall. To conserv this by law protected wall, the nummbers were added to be able to exactly rebuild it afterwards. August Geyler (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- understood that,and I Support--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 02:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks like some modernist artwork. It’s great that you have seen the beauty of this spot, it’s easy to overlook this. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 10:33:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good QI, but not special enough. Rainy weather, closed umbrellas, trash bag. No wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support the rainy weather, closed umbrellas and the trash bag all add to the scene. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 10:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Distracting lower left corner, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good, if he cut left more good will be lost. --Mile (talk) 11:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo is a celebration of recognition for us because we went on mountain hut tours there in our younger years. The rock at the bottom left does not bother us.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Bottom left is a bit distracting, overall it’s great. – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The bottom left is part of the scenery. -- -donald- (talk) 05:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Bottom left is a limit for an outstanding one, but, still a beautiful sight... – Terragio67 (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 08:50:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Malvaceae
- Info created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Water drops on white hibiscus (Hibiscus sp.) flower in the rain, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Shot hand-held in light rain with a gentle breeze. -- Tagooty (talk) 08:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really nice. --Terragio67 (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Now that's something. Wolverine XI 22:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting. --Zzzs (talk) 01:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 08:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indian coral tree with bright red flowers against the mist-shrouded Mallalli Falls, during the SW monsoon rains, Hassan district, Karnataka, India -- Tagooty (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 12:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Atmospheric, well composed. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good mystic shot. --Mile (talk) 11:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mystic, dramatic, beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per above, moreover, it is a difficult photo due to environmental conditions, and maybe taken from a slippery place perhaps dangerous...?ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 12:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Terragio67: There is a steep paved staircase with railings beside the falls. Slippery and tiring but not dangerous. Tagooty (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 08:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
- Info Chaniotis beach, Kassandra. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition, colours and detail. --Tagooty (talk) 09:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great arrangement. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Σαν τη Χαλκιδική δεν έχει --C messier (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Στις Μαλδίβες υπάρχουν ακόμα πιο όμορφες από αυτό, αλλά οι ελληνικές παραλίες παραμένουν πολύ όμορφες. Ακόμα θυμάμαι τις όμορφες παραλίες των Κυκλάδων :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice concept. --August Geyler (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, stripes on the sand and clear water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beach worth going to --Zzzs (talk) 02:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful minimalism. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 06:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but nothing special. Wolverine XI 22:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 18:25:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by Reinhold Möller - uploaded by Reinhold Möller - nominated by August Geyler -- August Geyler (talk) 18:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- August Geyler (talk) 18:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Große Klasse! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lackluster composition, considering we don't see the men's feet. Wolverine XI 21:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Expressive image, taken at the right moment. The composition works perfectly, it creates a Wow for me. The fact that you can't see the feet is not relevant, on the contrary: The concrete part in the lower part creates a cross element to the horizontal main scene on the one hand, and on the other hand, in my opinion, it emphasizes the hardness of the work the two actors are doing. Good light, good sharpness, great color accent of the signal colored work pants. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nomination August.--Ermell (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ermell: I am fascinated by the very allegoric scene you captured and composed so well. --August Geyler (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support +1 Terragio67 (talk) 15:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ermell: I am fascinated by the very allegoric scene you captured and composed so well. --August Geyler (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different --Wilfredor (talk) 21:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing extraordinary here to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 18:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Camelidae (Camelids)
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the animals in the background and the calf hiding behind the 3rd dromedary to the right. Wolverine XI 21:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 16:03:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very small and I much prefer this one of mine, not surprisingly. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- You said it, not surprisingly :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The bokeh here is nicer but I agree, resolution is too low. Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- They are feeding their chicks and if you have good wildlife photography ethics you can't get too close. I prefer to crop and have a lower resolution than to get closer and risk disturbing a brood. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It should be noted that there is no FP for this species El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- In FP, we are not looking for best of a species; that is VI. Although, it is useful to mention "no FPs". Lower techncail standards can be OK for rare/hard-to-get/once-only-opportunity shots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp's proposed image is a better candidate IMO. Zzzs (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Charles's photo doesn't reflect the true colors of the bird. His white balance is really weird El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Any WB changes could be made before (or after) my image was nominated for FP. We are assessing the nominated image on this page. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Charles's photo doesn't reflect the true colors of the bird. His white balance is really weird El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp's proposed image is a better candidate IMO. Zzzs (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Somehow, considering all. Fly helps. --Mile (talk) 08:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 14:33:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info Witch-beeches on Himmeldunkberg in the Rhön Mountains. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough wow. IMO has to be more of a spectacular image for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Belichtungskorrektur. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but this perspective just doesn't work for me. Wolverine XI 21:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info @ArionStar and Frank Schulenburg: I made some changes of the brightness. --Milseburg (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2024 at 03:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The bridge is not perfectly in the center,but due to your great noise control,I still think it is a good picutre.Ghrkya (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 11:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful recording for me. The roof on the right disappears somewhat into the dark trees, but that doesn't bother me. Just to know: Did you use a filter during the recording?--Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is a 10-second shot. Sunset was on the right side. No filter used. The camera was on a tripod, and another picture was taken with shorter shutter speed (2.5 seconds) to recover the highlights in post-process. Thanks! -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition and lighting --Tagooty (talk) 09:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Tagooty. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose reflection shouldn't take the salience. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 18:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Others
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support A thing of beauty. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A good image but nothing unusual to me. --Tagooty (talk) 09:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light, colours and composition. Not often it is possible to take such a beautiful photo of a natural monument. @Plozessor: The sky contains quite a lot very small dots; in my experience these are flies or other small flying insects between the camera and the subject. Because they are too small to be recognizable, you may want to remove them from the image; at least I try to do so in my photos. Just a proposal … – Aristeas (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 13:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by Ghrkya - uploaded by Ghrkya - nominated by Ghrkya -- Ghrkya (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support This picture was taken during the Spring Festival(or known as the Lunar New Year),and shows the yearly light show on the Xi'an city wall,which is the only well-protected city wall in China.I chose the main door of the city wall-Yong-Ning Men to record that(the whole city wall is too long to be taken).I believe this picutre can perfectly show the situation when Chinese people celebrate the Spring Festival. -- Ghrkya (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The people in the front are disturbing. You may have a chance if you crop a chunk at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply,I do had thought about this cropping.But I want to show how enthusiastic the Chinese people are when celebrating the Spring Festival.I can understand you that this people may looks a bit messy,but in a other way,the crowded people can perfectly shows the situation. --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 14:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh,I'm sorry that I forgot to ping you.@Poco a poco: --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 14:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply,I do had thought about this cropping.But I want to show how enthusiastic the Chinese people are when celebrating the Spring Festival.I can understand you that this people may looks a bit messy,but in a other way,the crowded people can perfectly shows the situation. --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 14:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, understood. Of course, I respect your choice and intention but the result is not FP to me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 16:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Thank you for your understanding.I totally understand different people have different views to one picture.I think I'll still stick to my opinion,but still thank you very much for your valuable advice! --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 17:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- emmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,also,my sentence may looks a little bit strange,that's because English is not my mother language,and I'm still learning it,please forgiven me! --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 17:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Thank you for your understanding.I totally understand different people have different views to one picture.I think I'll still stick to my opinion,but still thank you very much for your valuable advice! --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 17:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, understood. Of course, I respect your choice and intention but the result is not FP to me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 16:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I understand the objection about the foreground people, but when we consider this as a photo of the Spring Festival (not just of the building), the people are an essential part of the image. IMHO it’s OK that the people are out of focus, as the photo does not intend to show the individual persons, but the event with a mass of people coming and going. – Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ghrkya: But this means that the photo may fit better into the gallery section Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events, where we have many other photos of festivals etc. If you agree, please change the gallery link from Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#China to Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thank you for your advice!I do thought about changing the gallery,so I think I'm going to change it know.I didn't change it because my English is poor and it's too hard for me to find the right gallery ,but now I believe you gave me the right one,so THANK YOU again!
- And also,I have the same opinion with you on the people below! --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 02:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ghrkya: But this means that the photo may fit better into the gallery section Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events, where we have many other photos of festivals etc. If you agree, please change the gallery link from Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#China to Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 11:33:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Others
- Info CGI of a historical classroom, created by Christophe Seux – uploaded+rendered by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I find the map disturbing - Europe at the present time with a German Empire? Do we want this as a FI? I am not sure. The missing L is less problematic, this is a typical glitch. --Kritzolina (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info Well, I think it is on purpose, as it represents a historical scene back then (maybe 1900s or 1910s, where electricity should already be in use). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- (As a funny story) My school also had "present maps" with the Sowjet Union and so on :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I read it as a room from the 1950s or 1960s - but yes, the information what time it is supposed to be representing would be helpful. Kritzolina (talk) 06:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- (As a funny story) My school also had "present maps" with the Sowjet Union and so on :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose That was something 10 years ago. But today? Dull light, nothing special. Yann (talk) 18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I don't have a ready opinion about AI-generated images. ★ 01:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info It's not AI generated --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- A picture? ★ 16:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- CGI is a render image created by a human and not AI Wilfredor (talk) 20:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still neutral regarding rendered images that simulate pictures. ★ 21:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- CGI is a render image created by a human and not AI Wilfredor (talk) 20:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- A picture? ★ 16:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info The letter "L" is missing :-) -- -donald- (talk) 04:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it. A well rendered and very detailed scene. --August Geyler (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
NeutralWeak oppose Not a big fan of the errors pointed out by the others. --Zzzs (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 20:31:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Ostraciidae
- Info Female reticulate boxfish (Ostracion solorensis), Anilao, Philippines. This boxfish is native to the western Pacific Ocean and males can grow to 12 centimetres (4.7 in) in length (females 8 centimetres (3.1 in)). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Basile Morin: Brigthened Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile Morin --Tagooty (talk) 12:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Is the fish a male or female organism? Zzzs (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's a female. This one is a male. I could have nominated a set, to make it clear. Poco a poco (talk) 06:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A very good image. Perfectly made and composed to become a standard reproduction of that species. But as good as it is I can not find something outstanding in its composition.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustgeyler (talk • contribs)
- Well, I find outstanding that I this is a small animal and they are not common. You cannot know that, but as a underwater photographer I am proud of this shot Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's a point. I will think about it, perhaps change my vote. --August Geyler (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality for an underwater photograph of a small fish. – Aristeas (talk) 17:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Вид на вершину МЮД и на ледник Колесника из цирка Ледника Туристов, верховья Левого Талгара.jpg
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 18:43:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created and uploaded by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful scene, well captured! --Kritzolina (talk) 13:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice scene, but sharpness is not good enough for FP --Milseburg (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Regretfully per Milseburg. Beautiful but the right part is noticeably unsharp even in preview size. --C messier (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow --Zzzs (talk) 09:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 11:39:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
- Info created by Felinlove - uploaded by Felinlove - nominated by Felinlove -- Felinlove (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Felinlove (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
There's a halo around the animal.Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)- @Charlesjsharp You are right. There was a slight one. I uploaded a new version with the correction. Felinlove (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please fix the license in EXIF. -ND/NC licenses are not acceptable on Commons. Yann (talk) 13:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done! Felinlove (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition. Yann (talk) 20:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 11:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 08:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family:Libellulidae
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to have a look at other dragonfly QIs/FPs. The abdomen should all be in focus. Blown highlights too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I note for the abdomen for future shots, thank you :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 04:53:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Papaveraceae
- Info Half-opened flower bud of a Meconopsis cambrica, Welsh poppy. Focus stack of 52 photos. The delicate almost translucent petals of a Meconopsis cambrica.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see what's special about it, the lighting makes it look flat Henrysz (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special enough for me. Wolverine XI 16:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Assuming the background is natural. Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The background is pure nature. The photo was taken in morning light (23 Jun 2024 06:31).--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 02:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and colours, with a beautiful touch of minimalism. – Aristeas (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 12:45:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Like the last one, the portrait doesn't work. Wolverine XI 20:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The long stick is interesting. Please add the {{PR}} template on the pictures featuring people -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great picture --This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 11:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice but the layout (portrait) doesn't work for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The diagonal of the long stick, crossing the horizont, makes the composition interesting. – Aristeas (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very nice. But per Poco a poco. --August Geyler (talk) 08:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Woljeonggyo Bridge and stone steps on the bank at golden hour in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 04:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#South Korea
- Info No bridge FP from South Korea. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support but the stairs on the right are very prominent. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is intentional, since they are old stone stairs, and I like the grass on them. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 20:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The stairs in the foreground dominate. A different viewpoint or crop that emphasises the bridge would be better. --Tagooty (talk) 01:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tagooty. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 13:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality, light and motif. To me the composition with the steps is working. --Milseburg (talk) 14:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per above, the compo doesn't work to me. A part of the temple is not visible Poco a poco (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this composition with the stairs. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Tagooty. --August Geyler (talk) 11:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Milseburg and Tournasol7. The composition with the dominant steps seems to split the voters. That’s interesting (in some regard more interesting than consent) – it shows how differently we receive such compositions. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 02:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info Last nomination was a brief appearance on here before I realised it was the third of three open nominations. Whoops! Now that one of those two have closed, renominating. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait, excellent restauration. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 05 Jul → Wed 10 Jul Sat 06 Jul → Thu 11 Jul Sun 07 Jul → Fri 12 Jul Mon 08 Jul → Sat 13 Jul Tue 09 Jul → Sun 14 Jul Wed 10 Jul → Mon 15 Jul
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 01 Jul → Wed 10 Jul Tue 02 Jul → Thu 11 Jul Wed 03 Jul → Fri 12 Jul Thu 04 Jul → Sat 13 Jul Fri 05 Jul → Sun 14 Jul Sat 06 Jul → Mon 15 Jul Sun 07 Jul → Tue 16 Jul Mon 08 Jul → Wed 17 Jul Tue 09 Jul → Thu 18 Jul Wed 10 Jul → Fri 19 Jul
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.